Abstract

To the Editor: We have read the article by Barthel et al1 describing the first prospective trial to determine the predictive value of heart rate turbulence (HRT) in patients after acute myocardial infarction. In previous studies, the ability of HRT to predict risk was only determined retrospectively.2 We would like to critically discuss here the uniqueness of the emerging risk factor, HRT, in comparison with other parameters. Interestingly, Barthel et al1 found that HRT was the strongest ECG-based risk predictor. This conclusion is surprising for 2 reasons, as follows. First, in an editorial comment3 on the original article by Schmidt et al,2 it was noted that the positive predictive value of HRT is only moderately higher than other ECG risk parameters, and it was suggested that …

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call