Abstract

QT interval variability, mostly expressed by QT variability index (QTVi), has repeatedly been used in risk diagnostics. Physiologic correlates of QT variability expressions have been little researched especially when measured in short 10-second electrocardiograms (ECGs). This study investigated different QT variability indices, including QTVi and the standard deviation of QT interval durations (SDQT) in 657,287 10-second ECGs recorded in 523 healthy subjects (259 females). The indices were related to the underlying heart rate and to the 10-second standard deviation of RR intervals (SDRR). The analyses showed that both QTVi and SDQT (as well as other QT variability indices) were highly statistically significantly (p < 0.00001) influenced by heart rate and that QTVi showed poor intra-subject reproducibility (coefficient of variance approaching 200%). Furthermore, sequential analysis of regression variance showed that SDQT was more strongly related to the underlying heart rate than to SDRR, and that QTVi was influenced by the underlying heart rate and SDRR more strongly than by SDQT (p < 0.00001 for these comparisons of regression dependency). The study concludes that instead of QTVi, simpler expressions of QT interval variability, such as SDQT, appear preferable for future applications especially if multivariable combination with the underlying heart rate is used.

Highlights

  • Despite all the recent technological and biochemical advances, evaluation of a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) remains an essential diagnostic procedure

  • The RR interval variability is the dominant determinant of QT variability index (QTVi) while the QT interval variability provides only a secondary influence. This needs to be considered together with our other finding that shows that the underlying heart rate rather than RR variability drives the QT variability measured by standard deviation of QT interval durations (SDQT) or QTcvar

  • Many studies have repeatedly shown the risk-prediction capability of QTVi [32,33,34,35,36]. Both increased heart rate [37,38] and decreased heart rate variability [39,40] are well recognised strong risk factors. As we demonstrated, both increased heart rate and decreased RR variability increase the QTVi values, it is legitimate to ask to which extent the QTVi-based risk prediction is driven by true QT variability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite all the recent technological and biochemical advances, evaluation of a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) remains an essential diagnostic procedure. Electrocardiography benefits from technological progress and different signal processing methods are being developed to assist ECG-based diagnoses well beyond the conventional visual interpretation [4,5,6]. One of these ECG processing technologies is based on the temporal measurement of beat-to-beat QT interval variability. The recent position statement by the European Heart Rhythm Association has shown that increased QT interval variability appears to be a risk marker of arrhythmic and cardiovascular death [7]. The risk diagnostic value of QT interval variability has been reported in patients with cardiomyopathy [8,9], in long QT syndrome patients [10,11], in recipients of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators [12,13] as well as in a variety of other clinically and pathologically defined conditions [14,15,16]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call