Heart rate dynamics after pulmonary vein isolation: pulsed-field vs. radiofrequency ablation

Abstract

Abstract Background The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a pivotal role in the onset and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). During thermal ablation, the epicardial ganglionated plexi (GP) can inadvertently be affected, as indicated by a post-ablation increase in heart rate (HR), potentially impacting post-procedural outcomes. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) offers a safer and potentially more effective alternative, as lesion transmurality is not inversely related to safety as in thermal ablation. However, PFA's tissue selectivity may limit its effectiveness in ablating potential AF triggers like GP. Purpose We aimed to assess the impact of PF and RF energy on GP ablation by examining HR changes following PVI procedures. Methods We examined consecutive paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PVI at a single center, using either a variable-loop circular PFA catheter, as part of the inspIRE trial, or a conventional point-by-point RF catheter (1:2 ratio). ECGs were collected before and after ablation at multiple time points, including 1-hour, 1-day, 1-month, and 3-month intervals, with a 24-hour Holter ECG at 3 months. Patients without obtainable sinus rhythm ECGs at these time points were excluded. We also gathered data on post-ablation antiarrhythmic drug and beta-blocker usage. Data are reported as mean±SD, and analysis employed Student’s t-tests, paired t-tests, chi-squared tests, and multiple linear regression analysis to identify influencing factors. Results A total of 105 patients were included (PF = 35, RF = 70). Baseline demographics were similar (Table A). In the RF group, HR significantly increased at all measured time-points. In contrast, this trend was not observed in the PF group (Figure A and B). Following the procedure, the RF cohort exhibited a significantly higher HR compared to PF (7.3±10.3 vs. 0.8±11 at 1-day, p=0.018), and this difference persisted after 3 months (8.5±10.1 vs. 0.9±9, p<0.001, Figure C). These findings remained consistent when HR was assessed using Holter ECG data (HR at 3 months: mean 72.1±8.8 vs 65.8±9.4, min 55.2 vs 48.9; p=0.002, p=0.001, Figure D). The use of RF energy was the only predictor of HR increase after the ablation procedure (β = 7.687, p < 0.001, Table B). Conclusion Our findings indicates that PFA does not increase resting HR as seen with thermal RF ablation, suggesting limited effect on ANS modulation. The role of adjunctive GP ablation during PVI procedures remains a topic of debate.While PFA shows promising improvement in lesion durability, current evidence does not conclusively establish its advantage over RF. This invites contemplation about whether the addition of GP ablation in RF procedures could be a contributing factor. The absence of HR acceleration may pose issues for patients with sick sinus syndrome or pure vagally mediated AF. Further research is essential to confirm these findings and their clinical implications.Central illustrationTables