Abstract

IntroductionWe validated a Japanese version of the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) as a tool for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in bladder cancer patients treated with various surgical procedures.MethodsThe reliability and validity of the Japanese BCI were examined in 397 Japanese patients with bladder cancer via cross-sectional analysis. The patients simultaneously completed the Short Form (SF)-12, EQ-5D, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and Bladder (FACT-G and FACT-BL). The differences in BCI subscales among various treatment groups were analyzed.ResultsThis study involved 397 patients (301 males and 96 females), with a mean age of 70 years and a median disease duration of 29 months (IQR: 12–66 months). Of these patients, 221 underwent transurethral resection of a bladder tumor, and 176 patients underwent radical cystectomy (ileal conduit: 101 patients, ileal neobladder: 49, and ureterostomy: 26). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was ≥ 0.78 for all subscales, except the bowel bother subscale. Despite moderate correlations being detected between the function and bother score in urinary and bowel domains, the sexual function score was inversely correlated with the sexual bother score (r = − 0.19). A missing value percentage of > 15% was associated with old age (p < 0.05). The mean domain scores differed significantly among distinct clinically relevant treatment groups.ConclusionsAlthough revisions are needed to make it easier for elderly patients to comprehend, we confirmed the reliability and validity of the Japanese BCI. The Japanese BCI could be used for cross-cultural assessments of HRQOL in bladder cancer patients.

Highlights

  • We validated a Japanese version of the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) as a tool for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in bladder cancer patients treated with various surgical procedures

  • Several studies have described the use of HRQOL assessments among Japanese patients that were treated for bladder cancer [2]

  • We aimed to evaluate bladder cancer patients that had undergone various surgical procedures using the Japanese BCI via a multicenter cross-sectional survey conducted in Japan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We validated a Japanese version of the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) as a tool for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in bladder cancer patients treated with various surgical procedures. Several studies have described the use of HRQOL assessments among Japanese patients that were treated for bladder cancer [2] Most of these HRQOL studies were performed using generic QOL instruments, such as the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 (SF-36) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) [3, 4]. These instruments can be used to assess HRQOL related to physical well-being and functional, emotional, and social factors after cancer treatment, they cannot necessarily be used to evaluate bladder cancerspecific side effects.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call