Healthcare utilization and costs associated with a diagnosis of incident atrial fibrillation

Abstract

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia among adults worldwide and is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, stroke, and death. Prior studies have highlighted the healthcare burden associated with AF; however, contemporary data is lacking. As AF incidence and prevalence continue to increase due to the aging of the population, current estimates are needed for adequate healthcare resource allocation and policy decisions. Purpose The purpose of our study was to examine the healthcare utilization and cost burden associated with a diagnosis of incident AF in the United States (US). Methods Using the 2017–2020 Optum Clinformatics database, an administrative claims data of commercially insured individuals in the US, adult patients with an incident diagnosis of AF were identified. Adults with AF were matched on demographic and comorbid characteristics to those without AF using a propensity score greedy-matching algorithm with a 1:1 case to control ratio. Outcomes including medical services (inpatient admissions, emergency room [ER] visits, outpatients admissions, other services), utilization (all-cause, cardiovascular [CV]-related), and healthcare costs (sum of all medical services and prescription costs; adjusted for medical inflation and reported in 2021 US $) in the one-year post-incident diagnosis of AF were then compared among the matched cohort. Logistic and general linear modeling assessed healthcare utilization and cost outcomes. Results A total of 159,242 matched participants (79,621 AF cases and 79,621 non-AF controls) were identified. Among patients with AF, the mean age was 74 years, and 51% were females. Among the non-AF controls, the mean age was 73 years, and 50% were females. Patients with incident AF had significantly higher all-cause inpatient visits (relative risk [RR] 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71–1.73), cardiovascular-related inpatient visits (RR 2.42; 95% CI: 2:41–2:44), as well as cardiovascular-related ER visits (RR: 2.36; 95% CI: 2:30–2:42) as compared to non-AF controls in the 1-year following diagnosis (Figure 1). The one-year mean total healthcare costs were $25,006 (95% CI $24,357-$26,912) higher among patients with AF as compared to non-AF controls ($63,031 vs $38,025, p<0.001). Conclusion Patients with AF had significantly higher medical services use than non-AF controls. The higher medical services utilization among the AF cohort translated into a considerably higher economic burden in this cohort. Timely management and treatment remain critical in alleviating the significant financial and health burden imposed by AF on patients, payers, and providers. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Johnson and Johnson