Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was subjected to repeated repeal and replace efforts in the United States Congress in 2017. Attempts to repeal and replace the law failed, but penalties for not complying with its mandate that individuals purchase health insurance were removed in tax legislation passed late in the year and administrative actions taken by President Trump yielded additional concerns about the stability of the law’s reform approach and the expanded health insurance access that it created. This article explores public advocacy efforts by key interest groups from three major policy sectors—health providers, the insurance industry, and the business community—that had served as an “axis of opposition” to past American healthcare reform efforts. It identifies resource and incentive policy feedback effects that appear likely to influence these groups due to design features of the ACA and assesses whether patterns of advocacy efforts in 2017 are consistent with what might be expected if these design features had their predicted effects. Our assessment reveals patterns of interest group advocacy that are consistent with what might be expected to arise from resource and incentive based policy feedback effects, and interest group political dynamics that differ from what was in place prior to passage of the ACA. It also reveals advocacy patterns that are not well explained by resource and incentive based policy feedback effects, and—in so doing—yields insights that are relevant to the design of policy reforms and future research.

Highlights

  • During 2017, the Affordable Care Act (ACA)1 and a number of its key provisions were subjected to repeated “repeal” and “replace” efforts in the United States (US) Congress

  • Our findings suggest that groups in all three key interest group sectors advocated for or against specific ACA provisions in ways that are consistent with their perceptions of their resource-incentive based interests, these interests were not clear-cut in all cases and positions varied across groups

  • The Federation of American Hospitals (FAH) and the American Hospital Association (AHA) jointly commissioned a study of the impact of ACA repeal on hospitals, and it found that loss of insurance coverages associated with ACA repeal would lead to hospital revenue losses of $165 billion or more (Dobson, DaVanzo, Haught, & Luu, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During 2017, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and a number of its key provisions were subjected to repeated “repeal” and “replace” efforts in the United States (US) Congress. We identify policy positions and discuss advocacy activities by key stakeholder groups whose interests were affected by major design features of the ACA. We focus on advocacy efforts associated with interest groups from three sectors—healthcare providers, insurance, and businesses, sectors which have been called the “axis of opposition” to healthcare reform in the past (Brown, 2011). Our analysis yields insights relevant to Congress’s consideration of ACA repeal and replace efforts in 2017 and the use of policy reform designs that seek to foster resource and incentive-based policy feedback effects. The ACA repeal and replacement debates in 2017 reflect a pattern of policymaking that has become more common in recent years.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call