Abstract

Objective: To describe and compare the health status, emotional wellbeing, and functional status of older people in Uganda and South Africa who are HIV infected or affected by HIV in their families.Methods: Data came from the general population cohort and Entebbe cohort of the Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute, and from the Africa Centre Demographic Information System through cross-sectional surveys in 2009/10 using instruments adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO) Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE). Analysis was based on 932 people aged 50 years or older (510 Uganda, 422 South Africa).Results: Participants in South Africa were slightly younger (median age − 60 years in South Africa, 63 in Uganda), and more were currently married, had no formal education, were not working, and were residing in a rural area. Adjusting for socio-demographic factors, older people in South Africa were significantly less likely to have good functional ability [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.98] than those in Uganda, but were more likely to be in good subjective wellbeing (aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.60–2.90). South Africans were more likely to be obese (aOR 5.26, 95% CI 3.46–8.00) or to be diagnosed with hypertension (aOR 2.77, 95% CI 2.06–3.73).Discussion and conclusions: While older people's health problems are similar in the two countries, marked socio-demographic differences influence the extent to which older people are affected by poorer health. It is therefore imperative when designing policies to improve the health and wellbeing of older people in sub-Saharan Africa that the region is not treated as a homogenous entity.

Highlights

  • While this study highlights similar health problems among older people in South Africa and Uganda, the socio-demographic differences in the studied populations influence the extent to which older people are affected by poorer health

  • These findings illustrate the importance of using a multifaceted approach to measuring the health status of older people and will be valuable inputs for local decision-making in each country

  • For instance, one were to only choose either body mass index (BMI) or self-reported hypertension to compare the health status of older people in South Africa and Uganda, one may conclude that the health status of participants in the latter is better than in the former

Read more

Summary

Methods

Study setting Data used in this analysis were collected from the general population cohort and Entebbe cohort of the Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute (MRC/UVRI) in Uganda [25], and from the Africa Centre surveillance area in rural South Africa [26] through cross-sectional surveys in 2009/10. The general population cohort (GPC) is located in rural Kalungu district, southwestern Uganda, established by the MRC/UVRI in 1989. The GPC collects demographic and behavioural information, such as births, deaths, access to health care, and sexual partnerships in annual surveillance rounds. Demographic, social, and health information, such as births, deaths, migrations, and health care utilisation, are collected from all consenting households and their members [31] in twice yearly surveillance rounds since 2000. The Africa Centre surveillance has been described in detail elsewhere [31, 33] or www.africacentre.com

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call