Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to obtain health utility parameters among Chinese breast cancer patients in different disease states for subsequent health economics model. In addition, we aimed to explore the feasibility of establishing a breast cancer health utility mapping model in China.MethodsMultiple patient-reported health attributes were assessed, including quality of life, which was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) instrument; health utility and self-rated health, which were measured by the EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Multivariate regression models, including a linear regression model, an ordinal logistic regression model and a Tobit model, were employed to analyze health differences among 446 breast cancer patients. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine differences in multiple dimensions of health derived from the FACT-B and EQ-5D-5L instruments. A mapping function was used to estimate health utility from quality of life. Rank correlation analyses were employed to examine the correlation between estimated and observed health utility values.ResultsA total of 446 breast cancer patients with different disease states were analyzed. The health utility values of breast cancer patients in the P state (without cancer recurrence and metastasis), R state (with cancer recurrence within a year), S state (with primary and recurrent breast cancer for the second year and above), and M state (metastatic cancer) were 0.81 (SD ± 0.23), 0.90 (SD ± 0.12), 0.78 (SD ± 0.31), and 0.74 (SD ± 0.27), respectively. There were positive correlations between all scores, including every domain of the FACT-B instrument (p < 0.001). Results from multivariate analysis suggested that patients in the R and M states had lower scores for overall quality of life (R, β = − 9.45, p < 0.01; M, β = − 6.72, p < 0.05). Patients in the M state had lower health utility values than patients in the P state (β = − 0.11, p < 0.05). Estimated health utility values, which were derived from quality of life by using a mapping function, were significantly correlated with directly measured health utility values (p < 0.001).ConclusionsWe obtained the health utility and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores of Chinese breast cancer patients in different disease states. Mapping health utility values from quality of life using four disease states could be feasible in health economic modelling, but the mapping function may need further revision.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to obtain health utility parameters among Chinese breast cancer patients in different disease states for subsequent health economics model

  • The feasibility of using four disease states in health economic modelling The results from the rank correlation analysis suggested that overall scores of quality of life were significantly correlated with health utility values derived from the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (Table 6)

  • The results suggested that the mapping function generated more accurate health utilities for patients in the P, S, and R states than for those in the metastatic cancer (M state) (r = 0.720 vs. r = 0.715) (H2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to obtain health utility parameters among Chinese breast cancer patients in different disease states for subsequent health economics model. In China, the number of breast cancer patients has escalated in both urban and rural areas in recent decades, leading to a drastic increase in health expenditures and disease burden for both society and patients’ families [3]. Cost-utility analysis is an important method of health economic modelling It aims to compare participants’ health attributes, such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which incorporates the duration and health utility weights for specific health status [4]. Modelling research on health utility among breast cancer patients, is rare in developing countries, such as China, limiting the potential to conduct cost-utility analysis (CUA) in these regions [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.