Abstract
BACKGROUNDWhile recent advancements in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) have improved survival, reducing high levels of treatment burden remains a priority issue for many people with CF (pwCF). However, economic evaluations of novel interventions may fail to capture their impact on treatment burden due to a lack of suitable outcome measures. This study aimed to estimate health state utilities (HSUs), for changes in treatment burden associated with different CF treatments. RESEARCH QUESTIONWhat value do pwCF place on changes in treatment burden associated with intravenous antibiotic treatment of pulmonary exacerbations, inhaled medicines, and physiotherapy? STUDY DESIGNAND METHODS: Adults attending a specialist CF center were invited to participate in a web-based time trade-off interview. Participants valued their own health, and five health state vignettes describing varying levels of intensity of physiotherapy, inhaled, and IV antibiotic treatment. HSUs for additional instances of each treatment type were estimated using mixed effect linear regression models. RESULTSFifty one people with CF completed the interview (median age, 30 years; range, 19-66); 53% were female; mean FEV(1) % predicted, 65% [SD, 20%]).Mean utility scores for own health were very similar between the EQ-5D index value (0.81, SD 0.20) and the TTO value (0.82, SD 0.20), however limited concordance was observed at the individual level. Adjusted utility decrements associated with treatment burden were -0.037 (SE 0.008) for an additional annual IV antibiotic treatment, -0.029 (SE 0.014) for an additional daily physiotherapy session, and -0.019 (SE 0.013) for an additional daily inhaled medicine. INTERPRETATIONIncreasing treatment burden was associated with decreasing HSU values. The utility decrements associated with treatment burden changes suggest meaningful differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for pwCF. These findings align with existing literature on the impact of treatment burden on HRQoL, and highlight the importance of considering treatment burden in economic evaluations of interventions in CF.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.