Abstract

Nepal experienced a significant political regime shift in 1990 from the partyless Panchyat system to the present multiparty form of democracy. While political instability existed in the decade of the 1990s, reflected in the approximately one government per year, there had been continued enunciation of health policy priorities toward the rural sector, as reflected in the Nepal National Health Policy, 1991 (NHP (1991)) and subsequent plans. The objective of the paper is to assess whether clear enunciation of health priorities have translated into beneficial health outcomes, reflected in reduction of the child death rate, child morality rate, infant mortality rate and increase in the life expectancy rate. This question is assessed empirically over the 10-year period of fiscal year 1989/1990 to 1999/2000 using mainly secondary data published by His Majesty’s Government of Nepal (HMG/N), through the perspectives of input–output model and extension of health services, along with an indicative regression of a Nepalese health production function. The results (i.e. empirical observations) suggest that while there have been clear enunciation of health priorities, there have not been significant positive effects on health sector outcomes. The paper ends with a number of recommendations and concludes with the necessity for effective and appropriate implementation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call