Abstract

The main goal of this study was to obtain normative data of the scores of the Health-Sciences Evidence Based Practice (HS-EBP) questionnaire, and to analyse evidence-based practice (EBP) among potential clusters of osteopathy professionals in Spain. An online descriptive cross-sectional study has been applied. A total number of 443 Spanish practicing osteopaths answered a survey including the 5 dimensions of the HS-EBP questionnaire and sociodemographic, training, and practice variables using the “LimeSurvey” online platform. Results point out that the median scores for each five HS-EBP questionnaire dimensions were 95.00, 86.00, 78.00, 84.00 and 62.00 considering that the range of possible scores in each of the dimensions was: from 12 to 120 in dimensions 1, 4 and 5; from 14–140 in dimension 2; and from 10–100 in dimension 3. A clustering algorithm extracted 6 different profiles across the five HS-EBP latent dimensions: low scores in all dimensions (cluster 1); low scores in all dimensions but with medium scores in dimension 1 (cluster 2); mixed pattern of scores, low in dimensions 2 and 5 and medium in the rest of the dimensions; medium scores in all dimensions (cluster 4); high scores in all dimensions and low scores in dimension 5 (cluster 5); and high scores in all dimensions (cluster 6). Significant relationship was found among the response patterns in the clusters and: academic degree level, EBP training and training level, and work time invested in healthcare activity, research and teaching activity. These results allow a description of the actual level of EBP and differential profiles of Osteopathy care practice in Spain. Knowledge of normative scores of the HS-EBP questionnaire and identification of different predictors of Spanish osteopaths’ EBP, e.g., academic degree, EBP training and training level, work time invested in healthcare activity, research, and teaching activity, and having a working relationship with an accredited educational centre, enable a comprehensive evaluation of the EBP of osteopathic professionals and can also be useful for developing and implementing formative intervention programs for improving EBP practice in osteopathic practice.

Highlights

  • Evidence-based practice (EBP) is increasingly important worldwide for the improvement of healthcare quality by Health Services [1,2]

  • Knowledge of normative scores of the Health-Sciences Evidence Based Practice (HS-EBP) questionnaire and identification of different predictors of Spanish osteopaths’ EBP, e.g., academic degree, EBP training and training level, work time invested in healthcare activity, research, and teaching activity, and having a working relationship with an accredited educational centre, enable a comprehensive evaluation of the EBP of osteopathic professionals and can be useful for developing and implementing formative intervention programs for improving EBP practice in osteopathic practice

  • A higher percentage of participants linked to teaching centres could be seen in the cluster with a high score (37%) than in the cluster with a low score, where 86.1% were not linked to accredited educational centres

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is increasingly important worldwide for the improvement of healthcare quality by Health Services [1,2]. Healthcare professions have been asked to embrace the principles of EBP, and the osteopathic profession is not an exception [3,4]. With this ongoing movement towards EBP, osteopaths are required to take a more reflective stance towards their practice and to integrate research evidence into their clinical reasoning [5,6,7,8]. United Kingdom osteopaths were found to generally support and have positive attitudes about EBP, have moderate-level skills in EBP, and be infrequently engaged in EBP activities in spite of being interested in improving their skills in the field [9,10,11]. Regarding Australian osteopaths, they mostly agreed that evidence from research had a moderate to high impact upon their current osteopathy practice; they considered that osteopathy research is useful to help patients understand the benefits of osteopathy, to help other health professionals to understand the role of osteopathy in health care, and to provide scientific evidence for what they do as osteopaths [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call