Health-Related Quality of Life in Double Umbilical Cord Blood versus Haploidentical Marrow Transplantation: A Quality of Life Analysis Report of BMT CTN 1101

Abstract

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network study 1101 (BMT CTN 1101; ClinicaTrials.gov identifier NCT01597778) was a multicenter phase III randomized trial comparing the clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) of patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing double umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT) or HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (haplo-BMT) after reduced-intensity conditioning. At a 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in progression- free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the 2 cohorts. The impact of alternative donor source on QoL is unknown, however. English- and Spanish-speaking patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Short Form 36 (SF-36), EuroQoL-5 Dimensions EQ-5D, and Global QoL patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments pretransplantation and at 12 and 24 months post-transplantation. We compared longitudinal QoL measures between the dUCBT and haplo-BMT cohorts and investigated the association of QoL and clinical outcomes using an inverse probability weighted-independent estimating equations method, accounting for missingness and baseline variables. We found no significant differences between the 2 cohorts in any of the QoL scores pretransplantation and at 12 and 24 months post-transplantation. Pretransplantation scores were the only significant predictors of post-transplantation QoL scores. Relapse and grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were associated with significant declines in mean FACT-BMT and SF-36 Physical Component scores, and chronic GVHD was associated with a decline in mean EQ-5D utility scores. There were no significant associations between pretransplantation QoL scores and OS or PFS. Donor type did not impact post-transplantation QoL. Pretransplantation QoL scores and clinical events of GVHD and relapse were the only predictors of post-transplantation QoL. QoL was not associated with survival in either treatment arm. PROs may be valuable tools in pretransplantation risk assessment strategies to improve QoL outcomes.