Abstract
BackgroundIn Germany, animal welfare has become an increasingly important issue. Since 2006, German legislation demands self-monitoring of animal welfare by farmers, but there is a lack of prescribed indicators for governmental monitoring. Since recording of the health status through examinations on individual farms requires many resources, secondary data use is obvious. Therefore, this study deals with the overall evaluation and utilization of existing production data from the German pork production. Performance data and information on antibiotic usage and meat inspection were used for a benchmarking system of animal health in finishing pigs.ResultsSeven health scores and one total score were evaluated for 184 finishing pig herds on semi-annual basis between July 2017 and June 2019, based on the health indicators mortality, average daily gain, feed conversion ratio, treatment frequency, respiratory lesions, exterior lesions and animal management. In preparation, the selected health indicators were brought to the same scale and skewed data were transformed to build scores (MOR, ADG, FCR, TF, RESP, EXT and MANG). A differentiated analysis was carried out for three classes of initial body weight regarding to farmers’ fattening management strategies.ConclusionsThe present study shows that existing production data of German finishing pigs are usable for welfare monitoring. However, preparatory editing steps are crucial. The total score can only be an estimate of health status because partly bad or good performance could be disguised. It has also been demonstrated, that relative benchmarking is suitable for depicting temporary fluctuations in the investigated collective.
Highlights
In Germany, animal welfare has become an increasingly important issue
EFSA approach to define welfare describes two groups of indicators [8]: those predicting animal welfare directly or indirectly, and those having an influence on animal welfare
This study deals with the use of already existing data from the German pork production chain for health monitoring and a suitable benchmarking system
Summary
In Germany, animal welfare has become an increasingly important issue. Since 2006, German legislation demands self-monitoring of animal welfare by farmers, but there is a lack of prescribed indicators for governmental monitoring. EFSA approach to define welfare describes two groups of indicators [8]: those predicting animal welfare directly or indirectly (animal-based measures), and those having an influence on animal welfare (non-animal-based measures or resource- and management-based measures) Another definition from the Brambell Report in 1965 [9] describes welfare with the help of five freedoms: freedom from hunger and thirst (I), discomfort (II), pain, injury and disease (III), fear and distress (IV) and the possibility to express normal behaviour (V). Herdspecific data of 205 finishing pig farms for a time-span of 2 years from public or private databases were merged and analysed We had both production data, levied within the frame of quality assurance and consulting, and mandatory data concerning antibiotic usage and meat inspection. For Germany, this is a unique approach because there is no official or governmental monitoring programme dealing with a multiple set of indicators [1]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
