Abstract

ObjectivesEmpirical evidence regarding cancer screening and health literacy is mixed. Cancer is the leading cause of death in Asian Americans, yet screening rates are notably low. Using a population-based sample, we determined if health literacy: (1) was associated with breast and cervical cancer screening, and (2) helped to explain Asian cancer screening disparities.MethodsWe analyzed the 2007 California Health Interview Survey for Asian (Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, other Asian) and white women within age groups relevant to US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening guidelines: cervical: ages 21–65 (n = 15,210) and breast: ages 50–74 (n = 11,163). Multilevel logistic regression models predicted meeting USPSTF screening guidelines both with and without self-reported health literacy controlling for individual-level and contextual-level factors.ResultsLow health literacy significantly (p < 0.05) predicted lower cancer screening in final models for both cancer types. In unadjusted models, Asians were significantly less likely than whites to receive both screening types and significantly more likely to report low health literacy. However, in multivariable models, the addition of the low health literacy variable did not diminish Asian vs. white cancer screening disparities.ConclusionsSelf-reported health literacy predicted cervical and breast cancer screening, but was not able to explain Asian cancer screening disparities. We provide new evidence to support a relationship between health literacy and cancer screening. Health literacy is likely a useful focus for interventions to improve cancer screening and ultimately reduce the burden of cancer. To specifically reduce Asian cancer disparities, additional areas of focus should be considered.

Highlights

  • Adult health literacy is an established correlate to many cancer-related predictors and outcomes, associated with more advanced cancer at detection and other factors that may contribute to diminished knowledge, access, and desire for cancer screening, including poorer understanding of cancer communication (Davis et al 2002; Scott et al 2002; Berkman et al 2011; Bennett et al 1998)

  • Study design We analyzed the 2007 California Health Interview Survey for Asian (Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, other Asian) and white women within age groups relevant to United States (US) Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations and 2003 cervical cancer screening recommendations

  • Separate multilevel logistic regressions were performed for achieving each of the two cancer screening guidelines for (1) Asian Americans vs whites, and (2) Asian American subgroups compared to whites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adult health literacy is an established correlate to many cancer-related predictors and outcomes, associated with more advanced cancer at detection and other factors that may contribute to diminished knowledge, access, and desire for cancer screening, including poorer understanding of cancer communication (Davis et al 2002; Scott et al 2002; Berkman et al 2011; Bennett et al 1998). Contextual variables are one group of confounding factors missing from most studies of health literacy and cancer screening. Contextual factors, such as community-level ethnic density and the supply of screening facilities, have been associated with cancer screening beyond. Sentell et al SpringerPlus (2015) 4:432 individual-level factors (Datta et al 2006; Mobley et al 2010; Pourat et al 2010; Kandula et al 2009). Considering these factors in research on cancer screening generally is important. Individuals with lower health literacy in communities with a large supply of screening facilities may face fewer logistic challenges in understanding and acting on cancer screening-related health information (e.g., relevant bus schedules, hours of operation) than individuals with lower health literacy in communities without few or no screening facilities

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call