Abstract

To the Editor. —Parmet's physician-patient relationship 1 provides an interesting and informative glance at an often neglected issue surrounding health care reform. In the discussion of malpractice reform, Parmet makes two claims regarding malpractice suits under a national health insurance program: (1) the frequency of litigation will decline due in part to the fact that 10% of current damage awards are for medical expenses and (2) the severity of damage awards will decline due to elimination of the collateral source rule (total damages will be offset by covered medical expenses). As a result, Parmet writes, jurors are likely to reduce the damages awarded. The results of studies conducted on collateral source rule elimination, however, temper the optimism of Parmet's conclusion. In a study of the effect of tort reforms on the size and frequency of malpractice claims, Danzon 2 reported that the elimination of the collateral source rule reduced the

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.