Abstract

BackgroundThe introduction of health insurance in Ghana in 2003 has resulted in a tremendous increase in utilization of health services. However, concerns are being raised about the quality of patient care. Some of the concerns include long waiting times, verbal abuse of patients by health care providers, inadequate physical examination by doctors and discrimination of insured patients. The study compares perceptions of quality of care between insured and uninsured out-patients in selected hospitals in Ghana to determine whether there is any unequal treatment between insured and uninsured patients in terms of quality of care, as empirical and anecdotal evidence seem to suggest.MethodsA cross-sectional survey of 818 out-patients was conducted in 17 general hospitals from three regions of Ghana. These are the Upper East, Brong Ahafo and Central Regions. Convenience sampling was employed to select the patients in exit interviews. Descriptive statistics, including frequency distributions, means and standard deviations, were used to describe socio-economic and demographic characteristics of respondents. Factor analysis was used to determine distinct quality of care constructs; t-test statistic was used to test for differences in quality perceptions between the insured and uninsured patients; and regression analysis was used to test the association between health insurance and quality of care.ResultsOverall, there was no significant difference in perceptions of quality between insured and uninsured patients. However, there was a significant difference between insured and uninsured patients in respect of financial access to care. The major quality of care concern affecting all patients was the problem of inadequate resources, especially lack of doctors, lack of drugs and other basic supplies and equipment to work with.ConclusionsIt was concluded that generally, insured and uninsured patients are not treated unequally, contrary to prevailing anecdotal and empirical evidence. On the contrary, quality of care is a concern of both insured and uninsured patients.

Highlights

  • The introduction of health insurance in Ghana in 2003 has resulted in a tremendous increase in utilization of health services

  • With respect to adequacy of resources, there is no significant difference in perceptions of quality between insured patients in all indicators except waiting time at 10 % significance level (Insured: M = 2.75, SD = 1.37; Uninsured: M = 2.94, SD = 1.30) p < 058

  • The study finds that, overall there is no significant difference in perception of general quality of care between insured and uninsured patients and controlling for sociodemographic and hospital factors, that insurance status is not a predictor of quality of care in Ghana’s hospitals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The introduction of health insurance in Ghana in 2003 has resulted in a tremendous increase in utilization of health services. The period of the user fees was characterized by serious challenges, key among which was inequity in access to health care, especially for the poor [3] This resulted in decreased utilization of health care services at public health facilities [2]. The primary aim of the NHIS is to improve access to and quality of basic health care services in Ghana through the establishment of mandatory districtlevel mutual health insurance schemes. It aims to replace OOP payments for health services and to provide financial protection against high costs of health care at the point of service [5]. It is reported that the total membership of the health insurance scheme constitute 33 % of the total population of Ghana [7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call