Abstract

African leaders accepted in the year 2001 through the Abuja Declaration to allocate 15% of their government expenditure on health but by 2013 only five (5) African countries achieved this target. In this paper, a comparative analysis on the impact of health expenditure between countries in the CEMAC sub-region and five other African countries that achieved the Abuja declaration is provided. Data for this study was extracted from the World Development Indicators (2016) database, panel ordinary least square (OLS), fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) were used as econometric technic of analysis. Results showed that health expenditure has a positive and significant effect on economic growth in both samples. A unit change in health expenditure can potentially increase GDP per capita by 0.38 and 0.3 units for the five other African countries that achieve the Abuja target and for CEMAC countries respectively, a significant difference of 0.08 units among the two samples. In addition, a long-run relationship also exist between health expenditure and economic growth for both groups of countries. Thus African Economies are strongly advised to achieve the Abuja target especially when other socio-economic and political factors are efficient.

Highlights

  • Endogenous growth models [1] highlights the importance of human capital on economic growth and development

  • We see that the properties for the time series data for CEMAC countries and other Sub-Saharan African countries that spend more than 15% of the general government expenditure on health are stationary after first difference

  • Our results show that for the other Sub-Saharan countries there is a unilateral causality running from GDP per capita to health expenditure, health expenditure does not granger cause GDP per capita

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endogenous growth models [1] highlights the importance of human capital on economic growth and development. Health is an important determinant of economic development; a healthy population means higher productivity, higher income per head [2]. The importance of human capital to economic growth cannot be over emphasized [3,4,5] because it serves as a catalyst to economic development. The contribution of health expenditure on economic development emanates from the health led growth hypothesis [6]. It considers health to be capital; investments on health can lead to an increase in labour productivity,, increase in incomes and subsequent increase in the wellbeing of the population.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call