Health care provider and hospital decision-maker perceptions and beliefs on global environmental sustainability in the operating room.

Abstract

e18832 Background: Human health is intrinsically linked to the environment’s health; therefore, it is essential for the surgical oncology community, healthcare providers (HCPs) and hospital leadership alike, to incorporate environmentally sustainable practices, while continuing to provide high quality care. Hospital operating rooms (ORs) have a serious environmental impact due to a high rate of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, medical waste generation, and energy consumption. An evidence-based understanding of the environmental impact of ORs, as well as sustainability initiatives undertaken to decrease this impact, are crucial for generating and implementing appropriate policies and guidelines. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to determine the perceptions and beliefs of HCPs and decision-makers related to environmental sustainability in OR settings globally. Methods: An SLR was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Embase and PubMed searches were conducted to identify relevant studies published between January 2011 and November 2022. Results: The analysis incorporated thirty-four studies focused on the perceptions and beliefs of OR HCPs and decision-makers on sustainability initiatives. The majority of HCPs across all studies indicated a willingness to engage in these sustainability initiatives such as recycling, while noting frequent barriers that prevent participation, such as lack of awareness and education, hospital funding, facilities to carry out recycling processes, and guidance at the hospital level. One study noted that robotic and laparoscopic procedures, when compared to open procedures, generate greater quantities of waste and GHG emissions. In a survey of 400 anesthesiologists, the lack of support from the hospital and inadequate education were identified as the main barriers to OR recycling by more than 60% of respondents. Common sustainability initiatives suggested by HCPs included creating a sustainability steering committee, reducing overall OR waste via recycling and waste segregation, education and training dedicated to environmental sustainability and enforcement of rules and mandates for sustainability initiatives. Conclusions: HCPs are aware of potential opportunities to make ORs more environmentally sustainable and HCPs are willing, but not necessarily able, to participate in these efforts. Existing literature shows that HCPs have suggestions for how to minimize the environmental impact of the OR. Oncologists interested in adopting more sustainable practices can use this research as a guide for key themes and barriers to acknowledge when designing and implementing their own initiatives. More research is needed on the implementation and impact of sustainability initiatives on the environment.