Abstract

BackgroundWe previously demonstrated in patients with diabetes that displaying blood glucose results in association with color improved their ability to interpret glucose results.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions of health care professionals (HCPs) in specific countries about the value of color on a new glucose meter and to determine if HCP perspectives among countries differ on the value of this approach in clinical practice.MethodsA total of 180 HCPs, including 105 endocrinologists, 34 primary care physicians, 25 diabetes educators, and 16 pharmacists, were recruited from India (n=50), Russia (n=50), China (n=50), and the United States (n=30). These HCPs experienced the OneTouch Select Plus Simple glucose meter online from their own office computer using interactive demonstrations (webpages, meter simulator, and video clips). After providing demographic and current clinical practice insights, HCPs responded to questions about the utility of the color-enhanced glucose meter.ResultsMean age and years in their current professional role for the 180 HCPs was 41.3 (SD 8.1) and 13.3 (SD 6.8) years for endocrinologists, 41.3 (SD 8.3) and 14.1 (SD 6.8) years for primary care physicians, 37.5 (SD 8.7) and 12.7 (SD 6.8) years for diabetes educators, and 35.9 (SD 5.3) and 9.5 (SD 5.2) years for pharmacists. In all, 88% (44/50) of Russian and 83% (25/30) of American HCPs said their patients find it easy to recognize low, in-range, or high blood glucose results compared to 56% (28/50) of HCPs in China and 42% (21/50) in India. Regardless of country, HCPs had less confidence that their patients act on blood glucose results with 52% (26/50) in Russia, 63% (19/30) in the United States, 60% (30/50) in China, and 40% (20/50) in India responding positively. During the interactive online meter experience, HCPs from all countries responded positively to questions about a meter with color features. After reflecting on the value of this meter, most HCPs strongly agreed or agreed their patients would be more inclined to act on results using a meter with color features (Russia: 92%, 46/50; United States: 70%, 21/30; China: 98%, 49/50; India: 94%, 47/50). They also said that color was particularly useful for patients with lower numeracy or education who may struggle with interpreting results (Russia: 98%, 49/50; United States: 77%, 23/30; China: 100%, 50/50; India: 82%, 41/50).ConclusionsThis multicountry online study provides evidence that HCPs had high overall satisfaction with the OneTouch Select Plus glucose meter, which uses color-coded information to assist patients with interpreting blood glucose results. This may be especially helpful in patient populations with low numeracy or literacy and limited access to health care and direct interaction with HCPs.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has been increasing all over the world in past 30 years, and higher prevalence is seen in the Indian Subcontinent

  • According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), the global diabetes prevalence for the year 2013 was found to be 8.3%, affecting 382 million adults and it is projected to increase to 8.8% and 592 million adults by 2035.[1]. Currently, India is a country with second highest number of people with type 2 DM

  • The study was conducted at the medical out‐patient department (OPD) of Government Wenlock Hospital (GWH), an associate hospital of Kasturba Medical College (KMC), Mangalore

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has been increasing all over the world in past 30 years, and higher prevalence is seen in the Indian Subcontinent. Several studies have documented low levels of adherence to treatment among patients with diabetes.[2,3,4] Apart from regular medications, there are other beneficial activities that can help in improvement of quality‐of‐life among patients with diabetes and can lead to better prevention and control of imminent complications such as diabetic nephropathy, diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy through better control of blood sugar levels. Conclusions: Self‐care practices were found to be unsatisfactory in almost all aspects except for blood sugar monitoring and treatment adherence As these practices are essential for prevention of complications and better quality‐of ‐life, more efforts should be put to educate the people with diabetes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.