Abstract

Trends in population ageing parallel concerns with escalating health care expenditures. The purposes of this study are to (1) estimate the distribution of health care and long-term care costs to ascertain the relative importance of age vs. proximity to death as the main driver of costs; (2) explore the relative importance of user rates and costs per user as the primary driver of per capita costs of selected services for survivors and decedents, respectively; and (3) provide projections of future costs. We use data on service use for the entire Norwegian population from four national registers linked with the Cause of Death Registry to calculate costs per decedent in the last 365 days of life and the average one-year costs of people surviving at least two years. Future costs were calculated using projections on population and probability of death from Statistics Norway. We find that the substantial increase in costs at older ages among both decedents and survivors relates to higher long-term care costs. Health care costs peak in the late 50s among decedents and in the early 80s among survivors and then decrease with age. While costs in the last year of life for each decedent are 19 times the average costs of survivors, the decedent/survivor cost ratio decreases with age to less than double among those aged ³95 years. Expenditure projections indicate an increase in spending due to population ageing, especially in long-term care expenditures. For somatic hospital costs, proximity to death has a greater impact on costs than age; the age effect is more important for long-term care, implying that the “red herring” effect is larger for acute health care than for long-term care. Adjusting for costs during the last year of life reduces the projected increase in expenditures, but only to a limited extent.

Highlights

  • Trends in population ageing parallel concerns with escalating health care expenditures

  • While some studies conclude that age is not important once proximity to death (PTD) is taken into account (Felder et al 2010, Hyun et al 2015, Yu et al 2015) and others claim the marginal importance of PTD compared with population ageing for future health care costs (Colombier and Weber 2011, van Baal and Wong 2012), both PTD and age are typically found to be relevant (Raitano 2006)

  • The average costs of decedents were lowest for age groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Trends in population ageing parallel concerns with escalating health care expenditures. While some studies conclude that age is not important once PTD is taken into account (Felder et al 2010, Hyun et al 2015, Yu et al 2015) and others claim the marginal importance of PTD compared with population ageing for future health care costs (Colombier and Weber 2011, van Baal and Wong 2012), both PTD and age are typically found to be relevant (Raitano 2006). Whereas PTD may precede age as a determinant of individual acute health care cost, long-term care costs generally strongly increase with age (de Meijer et al 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call