Abstract

Urban tree planting initiatives are being actively promoted as a planning tool to enable urban areas to adapt to and mitigate against climate change, enhance urban sustainability and improve human health and well-being. However, opportunities for creating new areas of green space within cities are often limited and tree planting initiatives may be constrained to kerbside locations. At this scale, the net impact of trees on human health and the local environment is less clear, and generalised approaches for evaluating their impact are not well developed.In this review, we use an urban ecosystems services framework to evaluate the direct, and locally-generated, ecosystems services and disservices provided by street trees. We focus our review on the services of major importance to human health and well-being which include ‘climate regulation’, ‘air quality regulation’ and ‘aesthetics and cultural services’. These are themes that are commonly used to justify new street tree or street tree retention initiatives. We argue that current scientific understanding of the impact of street trees on human health and the urban environment has been limited by predominantly regional-scale reductionist approaches which consider vegetation generally and/or single out individual services or impacts without considering the wider synergistic impacts of street trees on urban ecosystems. This can lead planners and policymakers towards decision making based on single parameter optimisation strategies which may be problematic when a single intervention offers different outcomes and has multiple effects and potential trade-offs in different places.We suggest that a holistic approach is required to evaluate the services and disservices provided by street trees at different scales. We provide information to guide decision makers and planners in their attempts to evaluate the value of vegetation in their local setting. We show that by ensuring that the specific aim of the intervention, the scale of the desired biophysical effect and an awareness of a range of impacts guide the choice of i) tree species, ii) location and iii) density of tree placement, street trees can be an important tool for urban planners and designers in developing resilient and resourceful cities in an era of climatic change.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12940-016-0103-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Urban tree planting initiatives are being actively promoted as an urban planning solution to reduce the environmental degradation caused by urbanization, enhance urban sustainability, mitigate and adapt to climate change and to improve human health and well-being [1, 2]

  • We focus on trees along streets, as street trees represent a particular mode of greening urban areas which offer particular services and functions [6, 7]

  • This paper provides a critical review of the potential of street trees as an urban planning solution to improve human health and well-being through ‘climate regulation’, ‘air quality regulation’ and ‘aesthetics and cultural services’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban tree planting initiatives are being actively promoted as an urban planning solution to reduce the environmental degradation caused by urbanization, enhance urban sustainability, mitigate and adapt to climate change and to improve human health and well-being [1, 2]. The public perception of the value of green spaces and green infrastructure (especially trees) within cities has prompted a number of initiatives to promote the ‘greening’ of cities through urban reforestation and protection programs to increase the percentage of tree canopy cover, such as the New York City ‘Million Trees’ program [3], or the City of Melbourne’s 40 % tree canopy cover target. Such projects have stemmed from a wide range of different organisational bodies encompassing local to international-scale governance, community based, charitable and regulatory approaches. Key questions remain in urban design and planning as to how to invest in green urban infrastructure in ways which incorporate the large body of scientific understanding of multiple biophysical and social processes in ways relevant to human decision making

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call