Healing rate comparison of revascularized and non-revascularized diabetic foot ulcers with peripheral arterial disease

Abstract

BackgroundRevascularization is important for the healing of diabetic foot ulcers with peripheral arterial disease because it aids in the restoration of the perfusion function of the leg tissues and can reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications. However, no Indonesian studies have been identified that exclusively discuss the effectiveness of revascularization for patients with this condition. This study aimed to compare the healing rates of diabetic foot ulcers with peripheral arterial disease in patients who received or did not receive revascularization. MethodsThis cohort study included diabetic foot ulcer patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing treatment at our institution who received or did not receive revascularization based on the wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) score criteria. Wound healing was considered complete re-epithelialization within six months of the procedure or consistent epithelialization for four consecutive weeks. Patients who required amputation within six months of observation were deemed to have failed therapy. ResultsEach group contained 23 patients. The revascularization group exhibited a healing rate of 78.3 % (18 patients), while the non-revascularization patients had a rate of 26.1 % (6 patients). The wounds of revascularized patients were 14.944 (1.102–202.692) times more likely to heal than those without revascularization (p < 0.01). WIfI stage 2–3 patients showed an 11.926 (1.438–98.883) times increase in the likelihood of wound healing compared to stage 4 WIfI patients. ConclusionThe wound healing rate was higher for revascularized patients than for non-revascularized patients, and the severity of the wound based on WIfI score affected patient wound healing.