Abstract
Violent play in the National Hockey League (NHL), and in other hockey leagues, has been debated for decades; however, recent discussion has focused on particular actions related to body checking. Due to a concern for player safety, calls for a ban against blindside body checking and shoulder-to-head hits have been voiced. The main argument we critique is based on the vulnerability principle. In this paper, we assess the arguments for and against a ban on these actions. Those against the ban who prefer the status quo refer to ‘slippery slope’, ‘blame the victim’ and rules-based utilitarian arguments. Those in favour of a ban stress player safety, the role of referees, lack of enforcement of current rules, league accountability and declining respect among players. In offering an ethical analysis of blindside checking and shoulder-to-head hits in hockey, this paper offers a convincing basis to condemn morally questionable violent play in the NHL.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
