Abstract

Maintaining equilibrium while riding a horse is a challenging task that involves complex sensorimotor processes. We evaluated the relative contribution of visual information (static or dynamic) to horseback riders' postural stability (measured from the variability of segment position in space) and the coordination modes they adopted to regulate balance according to their level of expertise. Riders' perceptual typologies and their possible relation to postural stability were also assessed. Our main assumption was that the contribution of visual information to postural control would be reduced among expert riders in favor of vestibular and somesthetic reliance. Twelve Professional riders and 13 Club riders rode an equestrian simulator at a gallop under four visual conditions: (1) with the projection of a simulated scene reproducing what a rider sees in the real context of a ride in an outdoor arena, (2) under stroboscopic illumination, preventing access to dynamic visual cues, (3) in normal lighting but without the projected scene (i.e., without the visual consequences of displacement) and (4) with no visual cues. The variability of the position of the head, upper trunk and lower trunk was measured along the anteroposterior (AP), mediolateral (ML), and vertical (V) axes. We computed discrete relative phase to assess the coordination between pairs of segments in the anteroposterior axis. Visual field dependence-independence was evaluated using the Rod and Frame Test (RFT). The results showed that the Professional riders exhibited greater overall postural stability than the Club riders, revealed mainly in the AP axis. In particular, head variability was lower in the Professional riders than in the Club riders in visually altered conditions, suggesting a greater ability to use vestibular and somesthetic information according to task constraints with expertise. In accordance with this result, RFT perceptual scores revealed that the Professional riders were less dependent on the visual field than were the Club riders. Finally, the Professional riders exhibited specific coordination modes that, unlike the Club riders, departed from pure in-phase and anti-phase patterns and depended on visual conditions. The present findings provide evidence of major differences in the sensorimotor processes contributing to postural control with expertise in horseback riding.

Highlights

  • Horseback riding is a challenging task that requires regulating postural balance while sitting on a moving base of support

  • The Expertise × Segment interaction was significant for SDV [F(2, 46) = 3.95, p = 0.026], revealing that the head was more stable along the vertical axis for the Professional riders than for the Club riders, p = 0.047

  • The present study demonstrates a differential contribution of visual information to postural stability in horseback riding depending on expertise

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Horseback riding is a challenging task that requires regulating postural balance while sitting on a moving base of support. The contribution of vision to balance has received the greatest attention in the literature and has been tested in numerous conditions including the suppression of visual afferences by eye closure (e.g., Perrin et al, 1998; Perrot et al, 1998; Callier et al, 2001; Rougier et al, 2003), the stimulation of the central or peripheral visual field (e.g., Berencsi et al, 2005), the deterioration of visual acuity or the reduction of the visual field (e.g., Laurent et al, 1989; Schmid et al, 2008), the inclination or displacement of the visual environment (Isableu et al, 1997, 2010, 2011; Gautier et al, 2008), the selective suppression of dynamic visual cues by stroboscopic illumination (e.g., Amblard et al, 1985) or their gain in a ground optical flow (e.g., Baumberger et al, 2004) The results of these studies highlighted the importance of vision in balance control, but these conclusions should be moderated in the context of sporting expertise. Sports activities involve complex sensorimotor skills and constrain the subjects to act and process multiple information sources (proprioceptive, tactile, auditory, etc.) with a high level of accuracy and rapidity

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.