Head injury and associated disability in adults undergoing pre-sentencing assessment by criminal justice social work

Associations between significant head injury and persisting disability and violent crime in women in prison in Scotland, UK: a cross-sectional study

ABSTRACTBackground: Prior studies suggest a link between head injuries and substance use but do not routinely capture mechanisms connecting the two. Objectives: The goal of the study was to explore whether past head injuries predicted current substance use among young adults, taking factors such as stress, self-esteem, temper, and risk-taking into consideration. Methods: Data were drawn from a web-based survey conducted in 2014 and 2015 at a public university in the United States (n = 897). Questions were asked about history of head injuries as well as past 12-month binge drinking, marijuana use, and prescription drug misuse. To evaluate the association between head injury and substance use, two logistic regression models were performed for each substance. Head injury was first regressed on the outcome, then related risk factors were entered into the models to determine whether they explained any association between injury and outcome. Results: A history of multiple head injuries was associated with increased odds of bingeing, marijuana, and prescription drug use. Prior delinquency and risk-taking accounted for the associations with bingeing and marijuana use. Taking all variables into consideration, multiple head injuries were associated with greater odds for prescription drug misuse. Conclusions: Results suggest the need to give consideration to a range of concomitant variables when considering behavioral outcomes associated with head injury. Head injuries may be a marker of a constellation of risk-taking behaviors that contributes to substance use. For those with multiple injuries, misuse of prescription drugs may be an attempt to cope with lingering side effects.

Although a history of head injury is common in prisoners, little is known about its impact in relation to disability and potential associations with other health problems. This is relevant to the development of effective management and interventions targeted towards health or reducing recidivism. This study investigates effects of significant head injury (SHI) on disability, cognitive function, and offending in adult male prisoners and considers relationships with common comorbidities. In this cross-sectional study, adult male prisoners in Scotland were recruited from Her Majesty's Prisons Low Moss and Shotts. To be included, prisoners had to be men in adult custody, fluent in English, able to participate in assessment, provide informed consent, and not have a severe acute disorder of cognition or communication. History of head injury, cognition, disability, history of abuse, health, and problematic substance use were assessed by interview and questionnaire. Comparisons were made between prisoners with and without a history of SHI. The sample of 286 was demographically representative of approximately 8,000 adult men in prison in Scotland. Severe head injury (SHI) was found in 245/286 (86%) and was repeated over periods of time in 151/245 (62%). Disability was associated with SHI in 85/245 (35%) and was significantly associated with problematic drug or alcohol use, clinical anxiety, and clinical depression. Significant associations between SHI and cognitive test outcomes were not found. Prisoners with SHI had more arrests, charges, and convictions and at younger ages, and were at greater risk of involvement in violent and property offences. A history of repeated SHI is very common in adult men in prison and is associated with a greater risk of crime including violence. Disability after SHI often affects social relationships and is associated with multiple health problems. There is a need for policy and interventions to account for the "weave" of multiple health needs of people in prison, which includes history of SHI.

The authors aim to delineate cognitive dysfunction associated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by evaluating a well-defined cohort of former World War II prisoners of war (POWs) with documented trauma and minimal comorbidities. The authors studied a cross-sectional assessment of neuropsychological performance in former POWs with PTSD, PTSD with other psychiatric comorbidities, and those with no PTSD or psychiatric diagnoses. Participants who developed PTSD had average IQ, while those who did not develop PTSD after similar traumatic experiences had higher IQs than average (approximately 116). Those with PTSD performed significantly less well in tests of selective frontal lobe functions and psychomotor speed. In addition, PTSD patients with co-occurring psychiatric conditions experienced impairment in recognition memory for faces. Higher IQ appears to protect individuals who undergo a traumatic experience from developing long-term PTSD, while cognitive dysfunctions appear to develop with or subsequent to PTSD. These distinctions were supported by the negative and positive correlations of these cognitive dysfunctions with quantitative markers of trauma, respectively. There is a suggestion that some cognitive decrements occur in PTSD patients only when they have comorbid psychiatric diagnoses.

Traumatic brain injury has been associated with short-term olfactory dysfunction, but the association of number of prior head injuries and head injury severity with both subjective and objective long-term olfactory function is less clear. To investigate the associations of prior head injury, number of prior head injuries, and head injury severity with subjective and psychophysical (objective) olfactory function in older adults and to examine concordance between subjective and objective olfactory function among individuals with and without head injury. This prospective cohort study included 5951 participants who attended Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study visit 5 (2011 through 2013). Data analysis was performed between November 2021 and May 2022. Head injury was defined by self-report and International Classification of Diseases codes. Self-reported subjective olfactory dysfunction was assessed by the question, "Do you suffer from smell loss or a significantly decreased sense of smell?" Objective olfactory performance was assessed using the 12-item Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test. Overall, the 5951 participants were a mean (SD) age of 75.6 (5.2) years, 3501 (58.8%) were female, 1356 (22.8%) were of Black race, and 1666 (28.0%) had a history of head injury. Participants with prior head injury were more likely than individuals without prior head injury to report subjective olfactory dysfunction (24% vs 20%; difference, 4%; 95% CI, 1% to 6%) and have objective anosmia (15% vs 13%; difference, 2%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 4%) but had lower concordance between subjective and objective assessment (72% vs 77%; difference, -5%; 95% CI, -8% to -3%). In logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographics and medical comorbidities including cognitive status, participants with a history of prior head injury, particularly individuals with 2 or more prior head injuries and more severe head injuries, were more likely to self-report subjective olfactory dysfunction and were more likely to be found to have objective anosmia compared with participants with no history of head injury. Findings of this cohort study provide evidence supporting the association between head injury and olfactory dysfunction, particularly among individuals who experienced multiple prior head injuries and among individuals with more severe head injury. The findings also suggest that individuals with prior head injury were more likely to both under-self-report and over-self-report deficits compared with objective olfactory testing; therefore, it may be important to consider objective olfactory testing in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a history of remote head injury as a risk factor for subsequent dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: 271 participants of a community based longitudinal study of...

Although the prevalence of head injury is estimated to be high in juveniles in prison, the extent of persisting disability is unknown and relationships with offending uncertain. This limited understanding makes it difficult to develop effective management strategies and interventions to improve health or reduce recidivism. This study investigates effects of significant head injury (SHI) on cognitive function, disability and offending in juvenile prisoners, and considers relationships with common comorbidities. This cross-sectional study recruited male juvenile prisoners in Scotland from Her Majesty's Young Offenders Institute (HMYOI) Polmont (detaining approximately 305 of 310 male juveniles in prison in Scotland). To be included juveniles had to be 16 years or older, fluent in English, able to participate in assessment, provide informed consent and not have a severe acute disorder of cognition or communication. Head injury, cognition, disability, history of abuse, mental health and problematic substance use were assessed by interview and questionnaire. We recruited 103 (34%) of 305 juvenile males in HMYOI Polmont. The sample was demographically representative of juvenile males in prisons for young offenders in Scotland. SHI was found in 82/103 (80%) and head injury repeated over long periods of time in 69/82 (85%). Disability was associated with SHI in 11/82 (13%) and was significantly associated with mental health problems, particularly anxiety. Group differences on cognitive tests were not found. However the SHI group reported poorer behavioural control on the Dysexecutive Questionnaire and were more often reported for incidents in prison than those without SHI. Characteristics of offending, including violence, did not differ between groups. Although SHI is highly prevalent in juvenile prisoners, associated disability was relatively uncommon. There was no evidence for differences in cognitive test performance or offending in juveniles with and without SHI. However, signs of poorer behavioural control and greater psychological distress in juveniles with SHI suggest that they may be at greater risk of recidivism and of potentially becoming lifelong offenders. This implies a need for remedial programmes for juvenile prisoners to take account of persisting effects of SHI on mental health and self-control and education and to improve their understanding of the effects of SHI reduce the likelihood of cumulative effects from further SHI.

Primary objectives : To identify the incidence of head injury (HI) amongst mentally disordered offenders (MDOs) in UK medium secure units (MSUs) and test the hypothesis that patients with a history of HI are more difficult to discharge than patients without HI. Design, methods and procedures : One hundred and thirteen MDOs being discharged to community settings from five MSUs in England were recruited consecutively between 1 April 1999 and 31 December 2000. Data on previous HI, offending history and discharge planning were collected from clinical casenotes, structured questionnaires and interviews with clinical staff. Main outcomes and results : More patients with HI (57.4%) than patients without HI (47%) had a violent index offence. Risk assessments carried out prior to discharge showed patients with HI to be at greater risk of violence to others and of self-harm than patients without HI ( p h 0.05). All but two patients in the HI group were difficult to discharge (43, 95.6%), compared to 52 (82.5%) in the non-HI group. Conclusions : Information on previous HI should be collected on admission to MSUs and considered when planning for discharge.

BackgroundConcussions are gaining attention as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previous reports suggest concussion, also called head injury (HI), may be associated with changes to AD biomarkers, including amyloid and tau. However, there has been little characterization of biofluid biomarkers in older adults with remote history of HI.ObjectiveWe investigated whether aging participants at risk for AD with self-reported HI history would demonstrate alterations to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood plasma biomarkers of AD.MethodsUsing two-way ANCOVAs and linear mixed effects models, we examined both baseline cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between HI history, cognition, and AD biofluid biomarkers in 100 participants with HI history compared to 2411 without HI history from the ADNI dataset.ResultsOn baseline analysis, participants with HI history had higher CSF Aβ42/40 ratios than non-HI participants. There were no other baseline differences in biomarkers between HI and non-HI participants, nor were there any main effects of HI upon longitudinal analysis. We observed consistent main effects of age and cognitive impairment that suggested a pattern of worsened AD biomarker signatures in impaired participants with increasing age.ConclusionsOur findings do not support an association between self-reported HI history and AD fluid biomarkers in older adults from the ADNI dataset. Further characterization of fluid biomarker trajectories both in the acute post-HI period and in participants with remote HI is needed to understand the temporal dynamics of fluid biomarkers after HI and the implications of HI for AD risk.

Cause of head injury and between- and within-individual changes in impulsivity and binge drinking.

A series of neuropsychological tests known to be sensitive to the effects of chronic alcoholism was administered to 25 detoxified alcoholic patients with histories of mild head injury and 25 detoxified alcoholics matched for age, race, socioeconomic status, education and drinking history parameters, but without histories of head injury. None of the tests was performed at significantly different levels by the two groups. It was concluded that mild head injury did not compound the effects of chronic alcoholism among these patients, although it was noted that both groups demonstrated the anticipated impairments on the tests. It was also suggested that researchers need not exclude alcoholic subjects with mild head injury histories from studies involving the use of standard neuropsychological tests.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is Sensitive to Head Injury and Cognitive Impairment in a Residential Alcohol and Other Drug Therapeutic Community

BackgroundNeuropsychiatric conditions occur more frequently among elderly. With rising proportion of elderly in India, the burden due to neuropsychiatric disorders is bound to escalate. Many of these disorders have been associated with dementia, though the relationship is complex.MethodPrevalence of neuropsychiatric conditions, such as stroke, head injury, depression and early‐life stress were assessed in two parallel, longitudinal, aging cohorts, from rural and urban India, namely, the Srinivaspura Aging Neurosenescence and COGnition (SANSCOG) study and Tata Longitudinal Study of Aging (TLSA), respectively. As part of their baseline clinical assessments, subjects from both cohorts were screened for depression using the self‐rated, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the clinician‐rated, Hamilton’s Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Past history of depression and history of early life stressors, such as parental death and parental divorce in childhood were obtained. Self‐reported history of stroke, head injury and risk for vascular dementia using Hatchinski’s Ischemic Index (HIS) were also assessed.ResultProportion of subjects diagnosed with depression using GDS was 9.77% in the rural and 9.66% in the urban cohort, whereas corresponding numbers using HDRS were 6.55% and 3.82%, with female preponderance in both cohorts. Proportion of subjects with past history of depression was 4.82% and 5.07% in the rural and urban cohorts, respectively. Early life parental death was more in the rural 10.91%) as compared with the urban cohort (3.66%). History of stroke was reported in 1.25% and 2.31% of the rural and urban cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in proportion of subjects with history of head injury between the rural (4.16%) and urban (4.77%) cohorts. In the rural cohort, 0.23% scored above the threshold for vascular dementia on HIS, whereas none of the subjects scored above the threshold in the urban cohort.ConclusionGDS is a more sensitive tool than HDRS at screening for depression in elderly. Neuropsychiatric conditions such as history of stroke, head injury and risk for vascular dementia did not show any consistent trend of variation between both the cohorts. Further longitudinal assessments of these neuropsychiatric conditions along with parallel monitoring of cognitive changes will help in identifying their causal relationship with dementia.

BackgroundA non-negligible proportion of children grow up with problematic alcohol use in the family. Problematic familial drinking can be regarded as a stressor, and prior studies have consistently reported poorer mental health among adolescents who are exposed. However, it is also of relevance to identify modifiable protective factors which may buffer against stress-related ill-health in this group of adolescents. One context where such factors may be present is the school. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between perceived problematic familial alcohol use and students’ stress-related complaints, and specifically to explore if the school’s degree of student focus can buffer against any such negative health consequences of problem drinking at home.MethodsData were drawn from four separate surveys, the Stockholm School Survey (SSS) and the Stockholm Teacher Survey (STS) conducted in 2014 and 2016 among 7,944 students (~ 15–16 years) and 2,024 teachers in 147 Stockholm senior-level school units. Perceived problematic familial alcohol use was measured by one item in the SSS. Stress-related complaints were captured by co-occurring somatic complaints and psychological distress, and reported by students in the SSS. The school’s student focus was measured by an index based on teachers’ ratings of four items in the STS. A set of covariates at the student and the school level were also included. Two-level binary logistic and linear regression models were performed.ResultsPerceived problematic familial alcohol use was linked with an increased likelihood of reporting co-occurring somatic complaints as well as psychological distress. Cross-level interactions revealed that the association between perceived problematic familial alcohol use and co-occurring somatic complaints was weaker among students attending schools with stronger teacher-rated student focus. Regarding psychological distress, the association was weaker for students attending schools with intermediate or strong teacher-rated student focus, compared with those attending schools with weaker teacher-rated student focus.ConclusionsThe findings provide support for the assumption that favourable conditions in schools can buffer against negative health consequences of problematic conditions in the family, thus serving a compensatory role.

Many women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) experience repetitive head injuries in their lifetime, but limited research has examined the cumulative effects of multiple head injuries on post-concussion symptom severity in this population. This study examined how number of lifetime head injuries and episodes of loss of consciousness (LOC) due to head injuries were related to current cognitive, physical, and emotional symptoms among women survivors of IPV. Cisgender women from Kentucky were recruited following a protective order against an intimate partner, including 268 women with no reported lifetime head injuries and 250 women with one or more IPV-related head injuries (mean [M] = 17.2 head injuries, standard deviation [SD] = 50.5, median [Mdn] = 4, range = 1-515; M = 1.8 LOC episodes, SD = 4.3, Mdn = 1, range = 0-35, respectively). Participants underwent in-person interviews about lifetime physical and sexual IPV history, head injury history, and current cognitive, physical, and emotional symptoms. Sociodemographic characteristics, physical and sexual IPV severity, and current symptom severity were examined in relation to number of head injuries and LOC episodes. A higher number of head injuries was associated with greater age, White race, less than high school education, unemployment, and rural residence. No sociodemographic variables differed based on number of LOC episodes. Greater number of lifetime head injuries and LOC episodes correlated significantly with physical IPV severity (rho = 0.35, p < 0.001; rho = 0.33, p < 0.001, respectively) and sexual IPV severity (rho = 0.22, p < 0.001; rho = 0.19, p = 0.003). Greater number of head injuries and LOC episodes correlated significantly with greater cognitive (rho = 0.33, p < 0.001; rho = 0.23, p < 0.001, respectively), physical (rho = 0.36, p < 0.001; rho = 0.31, p < 0.001), emotional (rho = 0.36, p < 0.001; rho = 0.18, p = 0.004), and total symptom severity (rho = 0.39, p < 0.001; rho = 0.26, p < 0.001). In group comparisons, participant groups stratified by number of head injuries (i.e., 0, 1-3, 4+) differed in total symptom severity (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.15), with greater symptom burden associated with more head injuries. Participants with and without LOC differed in symptom severity: cognitive (p < 0.001, d = 0.45), physical (p < 0.001, d = 0.60), emotional (p = 0.004, d = 0.37), and total symptom severity (p < 0.001, d = 0.53). Group differences between participants with and without LOC remained significant after controlling for sociodemographic variables and IPV severity. There was no cumulative effect of LOC, in that participants with 1 LOC episode did not differ from participants with 2 + LOC episodes (p > 0.05). Based on hierarchical regression analyses, only physical symptoms were independently related to number of head injuries (p = 0.008, ΔR2 = 0.011) and number of LOC episodes (p = 0.014, ΔR2 = 0.021) after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and IPV severity. Among women survivors of IPV, cumulative head injuries appear related to greater symptom severity. Greater head injury history was independently related to worse physical symptoms (e.g., headaches, dizziness, sleep problems), whereas cognitive and emotional symptoms were, in part, attributable to cumulative physical and emotional trauma due to IPV. Women survivors of IPV with repetitive head injuries have unmet neurobehavioral health needs that may benefit from targeted interventions.