Abstract

Reasons for performing studyRecent studies evaluating owner sound horses have identified a large proportion of horses with motion asymmetries but the prevalence, type and magnitude of asymmetries have not been investigated. The increasing use of objective lameness evaluation necessitates a further characterisation of the differences between lameness and motion asymmetries.ObjectivesTo investigate prevalence, and quantify type and magnitude of motion asymmetries during straight‐line trot in riding horses, perceived sound by their owners.Study designCross‐sectional prospective study.MethodsVertical head and pelvic movement symmetry was measured in 220 Warmblood riding horses, all functioning in daily work and considered sound by their owners; 100 of these individuals had been included in a previous report [1]. Body‐mounted uni‐axial accelerometers were used and differences between maximum and minimum head (HDmax, HDmin) and pelvic (PDmax, PDmin) vertical displacement between left and right forelimb and hindlimb stances were calculated during straight‐line trot. Previously used symmetry thresholds (absolute differences >6 mm for the head and >3 mm for the pelvic variables) were used.ResultsThe thresholds for symmetry were exceeded for 159 horses (72%) for at least one variable, HDmax (n = 41, mean 12.7 mm, s.d. 5.5), HDmin (n = 58, mean 14.3 mm, s.d. 7.1), PDmax (n = 87, mean 6.5 mm, s.d. 3.10), PDmin (n = 77, mean 5.7 mm, s.d. 2.1). Contralateral and ipsilateral concurrent fore‐ and hindlimb asymmetries were detected in 41 and 49 horses, respectively.ConclusionsA surprisingly large proportion (72%) of horses perceived as sound by their owner showed movement asymmetries during straight‐line trot. It is not known to what extent these asymmetries are related to pain or mechanical abnormalities as opposed to ‘normal variation’ and this leads to 2 potential welfare problems – either too many horses in training are actually ‘lame’ or many horses categorised as ‘lame’ have no locomotor system disease.Ethical animal research: This study was conducted within guidelines of the participating sites institutional animal care and use procedures (C 206/10, C48/13) and informed consent for data collection was obtained from the horse owners prior to the study. Source of funding: None. Competing interests: None declared.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.