Abstract

Ten head and neck cancer survivors diagnosed with head and neck lymphedema (HNL) were imaged using near-infrared fluorescence lymphatic imaging (NIRFLI) prior to and immediately after an initial advance pneumatic compression device treatment and again after 2 weeks of daily at-home use. Images assessed the impact of pneumatic compression therapy on lymphatic drainage. Facial composite measurement scores assessed reduction/increase in external swelling, and survey results were obtained. After a single pneumatic compression treatment, NIRFLI showed enhanced lymphatic uptake and drainage in all subjects. After 2 weeks of daily treatment, areas of dermal backflow disappeared or were reduced in 6 of 8 subjects presenting with backflow. In general, reductions in facial composite measurement scores tracked with reductions in backflow and subject-reported improvements; however, studies are needed to determine whether longer treatment durations can be impactful and whether advanced pneumatic compression can be used to ameliorate backflow characteristic of HNL.

Highlights

  • Between visitsSubjects completed surveys assessing fit and comfort of the device and treatment

  • Ten head and neck cancer survivors diagnosed with head and neck lymphedema (HNL) were imaged using nearinfrared fluorescence lymphatic imaging (NIRFLI) prior to and immediately after an initial advance pneumatic compression device treatment and again after 2 weeks of daily athome use

  • Lymphedema treatment consists of skin care and complete decongestive therapy (CDT),[9] but HNL is often undiagnosed, and when it is, treatment is often inaccessible

Read more

Summary

Between visits

Subjects completed surveys assessing fit and comfort of the device and treatment. Areas of dermal backflow, observed by NIRFLI, were computed and profilometry measurements acquired as described in the online supplemental material (available in the online version of the article). Cancer-related history, and study compliance are available in Supplemental Table S1 (in the online version of the article). No apparent differences were observed between daily and bidaily treatment groups.

Impact of Single Treatment
Author Contributions
Findings
Disclosures
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call