Abstract

Deception studies emphasize on the importance of event-related potentials (ERP) for a reliable differentiation of the underlying neuro-cognitive processes. The stimulus-locked parietal P3 amplitude has been shown to reflect stimulus salience but also attentional control available for stimulus processing. Known stimuli requiring truthful responses (targets) and known stimuli requiring deceptive responses (probes) were hypothesized to be more salient than unknown stimuli. Thus, a larger P3 was predicted for known truthful and deceptive stimuli than for unknown stimuli. The Medial Frontal Negativity (MFN) represents the amount of required cognitive control and was expected to be more negative to known truthful and deceptive stimuli than to unknown stimuli. Moreover, we expected higher sensitivity to injustice (SI-perpetrator) and aversiveness (Trait-BIS) to result in more intense neural processes during deception. N = 102 participants performed a deception task with three picture types: probes requiring deceptive responses, targets requiring truthful responses to known stimuli, and irrelevants being associated with truthful responses to unknown stimuli. Repeated-measures ANOVA and fixed-links modeling suggested a more positive parietal P3 and a more negative frontal MFN to deceptive vs. irrelevant stimuli. Trait-BIS and SI-perpetrator predicted an increase of the P3 and a decrease of the MFN from irrelevants to probes. This suggested an intensification of stimulus salience and cognitive control across picture types in individuals scoring either higher on Trait-BIS or higher on SI-perpetrator. In contrast, individuals with both higher Trait-BIS and higher SI-perpetrator scores showed a less negative probe-MFN suggesting that this subgroup invests less cognitive control to probes. By extending prior research we demonstrate that personality modulates stimulus salience and control processes during deception.

Highlights

  • One of the main interests in forensic psychophysiology refers to the differentiation of truthful and deceptive responses

  • Stimulus salience and attentional control were investigated by means of the stimulus-locked P3 amplitude and cognitive control was investigated by means of the response-locked Medial Frontal Negativity (MFN)

  • The main event-related potential (ERP) findings with strong effect sizes are: (a) According to analyses of variance (ANOVA) and fixed-links modeling, the parietal P3 amplitudes were more positive to probe and target pictures compared to irrelevant pictures. (b) Fixed-links modeling results indicated that higher Trait-behavioral inhibition system (BIS) as well as higher SI-perpetrator scores were related to a more pronounced early P3 increase from irrelevant to target and to probe pictures. (c) The response-locked frontal MFN amplitude was more negative for probe and target compared to irrelevant pictures. (d) Fixed-links modeling demonstrated that higher TraitBIS scores as well as higher SI-perpetrator scores predicted a more pronounced MFN decrease from irrelevant to probe pictures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the main interests in forensic psychophysiology refers to the differentiation of truthful and deceptive responses. The relevance of the P3 amplitude of the event-related potential (ERP) has been originally demonstrated for persons who recognize items on that information should be concealed (sometimes named as guilty group) vs persons who do not recognize those items (sometimes named as innocent group) because they are unfamiliar with (Rosenfeld et al, 1988; Farwell and Donchin, 1991) These studies encouraged a growing research interest in the modulation of ERPs in deception settings and in elucidating the underlying neuro-cognitive processes of deceptive vs truthful responses. All deception tasks have in common that www.frontiersin.org

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call