Abstract
BackgroundMajor changes in the treatment of schizophrenia have taken place in recent years, including a shift from inpatient to community care, and the introduction of second-generation antipsychotics and psychosocial interventions. Recent evidence has questioned the superiority of these interventions over older treatments. AimsWe wished to ascertain the impact of changes in the treatment of schizophrenia in a geographically-defined area, focusing on clinical symptoms and psychosocial outcome. MethodsIn 2006, we replicated the survey carried out in 1981, identifying the population of people with schizophrenia living in Nithsdale, South-West Scotland, measuring prevalence using the ‘key informant’ method. We assessed their clinical and social functioning, using similar scales, and compared measures across both time periods. ResultsWe identified 205 people with schizophrenia, a point prevalence of 3.59/1000 general population. In 2006, while fewer people experienced negative symptoms, a greater number experienced positive symptoms. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of tardive dyskinesia or Parkinsonism, though tremor was less common in the 2006 population. In 2006, there were fewer people living with a spouse/partner or parents, and fewer were in open employment in comparison to the 1981 population. The overall level of social adjustment had not changed. ConclusionsThe clinical manifestation of schizophrenia appears to have changed over the last 25years, within this geographically-defined area, the prevalence of negative symptoms having decreased, and positive symptoms seem to have increased. The level of social functioning does not appear to have changed over the last 25years.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.