Abstract

Grazing is a fundamental process affecting grassland ecosystem dynamics and functioning. Its behavioral components comprise how animals search for feed, and gather and process plant tissues in different spatio-temporal scales of the grazing process. Nowadays, there is an increasing emphasis on grazing management and the role of the grazing animal on ecosystem services, concomitantly with a decreasing emphasis on grazing management generating animal production outputs. Grazing behavior incorporates both approaches, which are not necessarily dichotomist. It would provide the basis to support innovation in grazing systems. However, it is unclear how the significant knowledge, developed in this research area since the disciplines of Agronomy and Ecology began to interact, have supported creativity in grazing science. It seems there is a current gap in this context, which was a major concern of researcher leaders like Harry Stobbs. This paper pays tribute to him, reviewing recent grazing behavior research and prioritizing those studies originating in the favorable tropics and subtropics. New evidence on how pasture structure limits forage intake in homogeneous and heterogeneous pastures is presented. Pasture management strategies designed to maximize bite mass and forage intake per unit grazing time are assumed to promote both animal production and landscape value. To conclude, a Brazilian case study (PISA) is briefly described to illustrate how grazing behavior research can reach farmers and change their lives by using simple management strategies (“take the best and leave the rest” rule) supported by reductionist approaches applied in holistic frameworks.

Highlights

  • Harry Stobbs had a strong desire that results of scientific research would reach practicing farmers in the field and be adopted

  • This review aims to pay tribute to Harry Stobbs by reviewing grazing behavior research that aims to support grazing management and secondary production in the favorable tropical/subtropical areas

  • The results suggest that grazing animals take more time to gather a given bite mass in tropical than in temperate pastures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Harry Stobbs had a strong desire that results of scientific research would reach practicing farmers in the field and be adopted. Animal performance reaches a maximum at forage allowances of 12% (Pinto et al 2008; Nabinger et al 2011; Mezzalira et al 2012b), and data from Bremm et al (2012) support the conclusion that at tussock frequency above ~35%, intake rate of animals is decreased by the costs related to the time spent avoiding tussocks when searching for better feeding stations This impact depends on the animal species, as evidence suggests that, for each 1% increase in frequency of tussocks, time spent grazing on the inter-tussock areas by heifers reduces by 0.6%, while the reduction by ewes is only 0.36% (Bremm et al 2012).

95 Palhano et al 2006
Findings
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.