Abstract

The paper discusses the use of geographical indications in the protection of traditional knowledge based agricultural products in the international intellectual property framework. It assesses the promise of geographical indications in the effort to cater for the needs of indigenous people and local communities. The paper indicates that the utility of geographical indications with regard to traditional knowledge should be seen in light of the contemporary understanding of the link between “development” and “culture,” not just economic viability. While arguing that geographical indications may serve as a modality for positively protecting a particular category of products of traditional knowledge, the paper holds that it is wrong to promote geographical indications as solutions to all social, cultural, environmental and economic problems that ensue from the lack of protection of traditional knowledge. Thus, it concludes that geographical indications may not be ideal instruments to combat “biopiracy,” but are best utilized as part, or independently of a defensive sui generis protection of traditional knowledge.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.