Abstract

ABSTRACTCoffee is generally grown in areas derived from forest, and both its expansion and management cause biodiversity loss. Sustainability standards in coffee are well established but have been criticized while social and environmental impact is elusive. This paper assesses the issue-attention cycle of coffee production in India and Nicaragua, including producer concerns and responses over time to concerns (sustainability standards, public regulations and development projects). Systematic comparison of the socioeconomic, environmental and policy context in both countries is then used to explore potential effects of sustainability standards. Results show limits, in local context, to relevance of global certification approaches: in both countries due to naturally high levels of biodiversity within coffee production systems global standards are easily met. They do not provide recognition for the swing potential (difference between best and worst) and do not raise the bar of environmental outcomes though nationally biodiversity declines. Nicaraguan regulations have focused on the socioeconomic development of the coffee sector via strengthening producer organizations, while India prioritized environmental and biodiversity conservation. In India, externally driven sustainability standards partially replace the existing producer–buyer relationship while in Nicaragua standards are desired by producer organizations. The temporal comparison shows that recently local stakeholders harness improvements through their unique local value propositions: the ‘small producer’ symbol in Nicaragua and certification of geographic origin in India. Nicaragua builds on the strength of its smallholder sector while India builds on its strength of being home to a global biodiversity hotspot.EDITED BY Beria Leimona

Highlights

  • The ecological range of coffee, especially the highervalued Arabica coffee, coincides with mountain forests, most of considerable biodiversity and locally relevant as providers of ecosystem services (Dewi et al 2017)

  • This paper aims to address this gap by a systematic comparison of socioeconomic and ecological conditions and the history of policies that directly and indirectly influence social, economic and environmental sustainability of coffee production in Nicaragua and India

  • As coffee farmers have become less dependent on ecosystem services provided by forest trees, such as microclimate regulation in the form of temperature and humidity control and provision of organic matter, native shade trees are being replaced by exotic species such as Grevillea robusta (Garcia et al 2010; Nath et al 2011, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Ernesto Méndez University of Vermont

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/calsfac Part of the Agriculture Commons, Community Health Commons, Human Ecology Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Place and Environment Commons, and the Sustainability Commons. Recommended Citation Mithöfer D, Méndez VE, Bose A, Vaast P. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management. ISSN: 2151-3732 (Print) 2151-3740 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tbsm. Harnessing local strength for sustainable coffee value chains in India and Nicaragua: reevaluating certification to global sustainability standards. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES & MANAGEMENT, 2017 VOL. Ernesto Méndez b, Arshiya Bose c,d and Philippe Vaaste,f aFaculty of Life Sciences, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, Kleve, Germany; bAgroecology and Livelihoods Collaborative (ALC), University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; cDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; dGroup of Forest Development and Management, ETH-Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland; eUMR Eco&Sols, Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), Université de Montpellier, Montpellier cedex 2, France; fVietnam Office, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Hanoi, Vietnam

Introduction
Current local issues and swing potential in the country case study sites
Northern Nicaragua
Responses to concerns over time in the case study countries
Country comparison and discussion of enabling and limiting contextual factors
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call