Abstract

The United Nations’ Agenda 2030 marks significant progress towards sustainable development by making explicit the intention to integrate previously separate social, economic and environmental agendas. Despite this intention, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which were adopted to implement the agenda, are fragmented in their formulation and largely sectoral. We contend that while the design of the SDG monitoring is based on a systems approach, it still misses most of the dynamics and complexity relevant to sustainability outcomes. We propose that insights from the study of social-ecological systems offer a more integrated approach to the implementation of Agenda 2030, particularly the monitoring of progress towards sustainable development outcomes. Using five key features highlighted by the study of social-ecological systems (SESs) relevant to sustainable development: (1) social-ecological feedbacks, (2) resilience, (3) heterogeneity, (4) nonlinearity, and (5) cross-scale dynamics. We analyze the current set of SDG indicators based on these features to explore current progress in making them operational. Our analysis finds that 59% of the indicators account for heterogeneity, 33% for cross-scale dynamics, 23% for nonlinearities, and 18% and 17%, respectively, for social-ecological feedbacks and resilience. Our findings suggest limited use of complex SES science in the current design of SDG monitoring, but combining our findings with recent studies of methods to operationalize SES features suggests future directions for sustainable development monitoring for the current as well as post 2030 set of indicators.

Highlights

  • The major challenges currently facing the world, including persistent poverty, rising inequalities, biodiversity loss, and climate change, are increasingly recognized as the emergent outcomes of complex social and ecological interactions [1,2,3,4]

  • The study of complex adaptive systems has highlighted that interactions between individual and diverse components or actors results in emergent behavior or properties at a macro-level that cannot be predicted from micro-level components or properties [37,38,39]

  • We clarify the core features and explain how we applied each feature to evaluate the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicators. Through this analysis of current indicators, we present a set of recommendations to harness the potential value that may be added by an social-ecological systems (SESs) perspective

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The major challenges currently facing the world, including persistent poverty, rising inequalities, biodiversity loss, and climate change, are increasingly recognized as the emergent outcomes of complex social and ecological interactions [1,2,3,4]. The study of complex adaptive systems has highlighted that interactions between individual and diverse components or actors results in emergent behavior or properties at a macro-level that cannot be predicted from micro-level components or properties [37,38,39] This challenges the assumption underlying many system approaches, that micro-level monitoring of separate social, economic, and ecological variables can be reconstructed to understand sustainability outcomes including trade-offs or possible future scenarios. SES is defined as complex adaptive systems, with strong interdependence and irreducibility between social and ecological systems across multiple scales Recent reviews of this literature have highlighted key features that constitute complex SES relevant to sustainable development, including the importance of social-ecological interactions and feedbacks, non-linear dynamics, cross-scale (spatial and temporal) dynamics, diversity, and resilience [22,27,41]. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1190 recommendations for sustainable development monitoring for the current set of indicators, as well as future improvements post-2030

Materials and Methods
Social-Ecological Feedbacks
Resilience
Heterogeneity
Nonlinearity
Cross-Scales Dynamics
Results
Discussion
Cross-Scale Dynamics
Nonlinearities
Moving towards Dynamic System Indicators for Sustainable Development
Proportion of population living in households with access to basic services
Prevalence of undernourishment
Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustainable agriculture
Suicide mortality rate
Death rate due to road traffic injuries
Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning
Proportion of women in managerial positions
Change in the extent of water-related ecosystems over time
Energy intensity measured in terms of primary energy and GDP
Annual growth rate of real GDP per capita
Annual growth rate of real GDP per employed person
Research and development expenditure as a proportion of GDP
10.7.2. Number of countries that have 10 implemented well-managed migration policies
11.3.1. Ratio of land consumption rate to population growth rate
12.3.1. Global food loss index
12.6.1. Number of companies publishing sustainability reports
14.5.1. Coverage of protected areas in relation to marine areas
15.7.1. Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
16.3.2. Unsentenced detainees as a proportion of overall prison population
17.13.1. Macroeconomic Dashboard
17.4.1. Debt service as a proportion of exports of goods and services
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call