Abstract

In 2011 the Financial Stability Board designated 29 of the world’s largest banks as global-systemically important banks (G-SIB), and imposed additional restrictions on their activities. After implementation of the G-SIB regulatory regime, we find that relative to other large banks, G-SIBs’ individual default risks increased, the co-movements among G-SIBs’ stock returns, CDS spreads and implied option volatilities increased, and several accounting performance measures converged. Consequently, an adverse shock to one G-SIB is more likely to be associated with an adverse shock to other G-SIBs, which weakens the ability of the banking system to withstand the shock.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.