Abstract

The assumptions underlying harm reduction approaches, and some of the difficulties encountered when trying to implement them, are discussed. The issues considered include widespread moral opposition to harm reduction; a lack of political will; disputes about what works; harm reduction strategies that have sometimes caused harm; the fact that many effective interventions are simply not implemented; and the fact that drug users are themselves sometimes resistant to, and are careless, or casual, about harm reduction. It is concluded that pursuing harm reduction approaches, despite the many barriers to their effective implementation, continues to be worthwhile.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.