Abstract

In this paper, we initiate the study of total liar's domination of a graph. A subset L⊆V of a graph G=(V,E) is called a total liar's dominating set of G if (i) for all v?V, |N G (v)?L|?2 and (ii) for every pair u,v?V of distinct vertices, |(N G (u)?N G (v))?L|?3. The total liar's domination number of a graph G is the cardinality of a minimum total liar's dominating set of G and is denoted by ? TLR (G). The Minimum Total Liar's Domination Problem is to find a total liar's dominating set of minimum cardinality of the input graph G. Given a graph G and a positive integer k, the Total Liar's Domination Decision Problem is to check whether G has a total liar's dominating set of cardinality at most k. In this paper, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a total liar's dominating set in a graph. We show that the Total Liar's Domination Decision Problem is NP-complete for general graphs and is NP-complete even for split graphs and hence for chordal graphs. We also propose a 2(lnΔ(G)+1)-approximation algorithm for the Minimum Total Liar's Domination Problem, where Δ(G) is the maximum degree of the input graph G. We show that Minimum Total Liar's Domination Problem cannot be approximated within a factor of $(\frac{1}{8}-\epsilon)\ln(|V|)$ for any ∈>0, unless NP⊆DTIME(|V|loglog|V|). Finally, we show that Minimum Total Liar's Domination Problem is APX-complete for graphs with bounded degree 4.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.