Abstract
Medicine is largely self-governed. This is so because the public, the citizens of the state, have permitted it. Professional self-government does not result from natural or constitutional right. It is a privilege. Society believes it lacks the knowledge and expertise needed to review the quality of professional service or to evaluate professional judgments. But beliefs can and do change. The public can be stampeded into believing (1) its rights are being impinged upon (2) medicine isn't policing its own ranks (3) the privilege of self-government should be restricted or curtailed, or (4) the public should participate with the profession in administering self-government. Medical societies appear to have been reluctant to tackle tough problems relating to questionable actions by their members. It is amazing how many excuses can be found for not conducting an investigation or for not taking action. One common excuse is that if the medical society becomes involved
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.