Abstract

AbstractHandwriting analysis is conducted by forensic document examiners who are able to visually recognize characteristics of writing to evaluate the evidence of writership. Recently, there have been incentives to investigate how to quantify the similarity between two written documents to support the conclusions drawn by experts. We use an automatic algorithm within the “handwriter” package in R, to decompose a handwritten sample into small graphical units of writing. These graphs are sorted into 40 exemplar groups or clusters. We hypothesize that the frequency with which a person contributes graphs to each cluster is characteristic of their handwriting. Given two questioned handwritten documents, we can then use the vectors of cluster frequencies to quantify the similarity between the two documents. We extract features from the difference between the vectors and combine them using a random forest. The output from the random forest is used as the similarity score to compare documents. We estimate the distributions of the similarity scores computed from multiple pairs of documents known to have been written by the same and by different persons, and use these estimated densities to obtain score‐based likelihood ratios (SLRs) that rely on different assumptions. We find that the SLRs are able to indicate whether the similarity observed between two documents is more or less likely depending on writership.

Highlights

  • 1.1 BackgroundHandwriting analysis has traditionally been conducted through the expertise of forensic examiners by visually comparing writing samples

  • There has been an increase in research related to quantifying the similarity between two handwriting samples

  • FLASH ID is a software tool developed by Sciometrics that uses the topology and “geometric features” in handwriting samples from a closed data set

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Handwriting analysis has traditionally been conducted through the expertise of forensic examiners by visually comparing writing samples. Within the 2009 National Research Council’s report “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States” is an outline of the current practices within the field with the conclusion that the scientific basis of handwriting analysis must be strengthened (Council, 2009). FLASH ID provides a ranked list of the writers within that data set who are most likely to have written a questioned document based on similarity in writing features (Miller et al, 2017). Another approach by Hepler et al (2012) numerically evaluates the similarity in handwriting with score-based likelihood ratios

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call