Abstract
Introduction: Timely defibrillation in ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (VFCA) is associated with good outcome. While defibrillation skills of pediatric providers have been reported to be poor, the factors related to poor hands-on defibrillation skills of pediatric providers are largely unknown. The aim of our study was to evaluate delay in individual steps of the defibrillation and human and non-human factors associated with poor hands-on defibrillation skills among pediatric acute care providers during a simulated VFCA scenario.Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of video evaluation of hands-on defibrillation skills of pediatric providers in a simulated VFCA in our children's hospital. Each provider was asked to use pads followed by paddles to provide 2 J/kg shock to an infant mannequin in VFCA. The hands-on skills were evaluated for struggle with any step of defibrillation, defined a priori as >10 s delay with particular step. The data was analyzed using chi-square test with significant p-value < 0.05.Results: A total of 68 acute care providers were evaluated. Median time to first shock was 97 s (IQR: 60–122.5 s) and did not correlate with provider factors, except previous experience with the defibrillator used in study. The number of providers who struggled (>10 s delay) with each of connecting the pads/paddles to the device, using pads/paddles on the mannequin and using buttons on the machine was 34 (50%), 26 (38%), and 31 (46%), respectively.Conclusions: The defibrillation skills of providers in a tertiary care children's hospital are poor. Both human and machine-related factors are associated with delay in defibrillation. Prior use of the study defibrillator is associated with a significantly shorter time-to-first shock as compared to prior use of any other defibrillator or no prior use of any defibrillator.
Highlights
Defibrillation in ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (VFCA) is associated with good outcome
In order to keep the process of defibrillation in our study close to “real” and to maintain consistency with each scenario, we provided the defibrillator the way it is always kept on our code cart (Figure 1)
The median time elapsed between the day of last PALS certification and the day the defibrillation skills were tested was 273 days (IQR: 90–395 days)
Summary
Defibrillation in ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (VFCA) is associated with good outcome. While defibrillation skills of pediatric providers have been reported to be poor, the factors related to poor hands-on defibrillation skills of pediatric providers are largely unknown. The aim of our study was to evaluate delay in individual steps of the defibrillation and human and non-human factors associated with poor hands-on defibrillation skills among pediatric acute care providers during a simulated VFCA scenario. As opposed to previous reports, recent studies suggest improved survival to discharge among pediatric, in-hospital cardiac arrests, driven largely by an improvement in resuscitation techniques [2,3,4]. For VF and PVT arrest, prompt defibrillation and highquality CPR are recommended. For every minute delay in defibrillation, survival rates from witnessed VFCA decrease 7– 10% and with CPR, the decrease in survival averages 3–4% per minute [10]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
