Abstract
Analysis of historical data in data warehouses contributes significantly toward future decision-making. A number of design factors including, slowly changing dimensions (SCDs), affect the quality of such analysis. In SCDs, attribute values may change over time and must be tracked. They should maintain consistency and correctness of data, and show good query performance. We identify that SCDs can have three types of validity periods: disjoint, overlapping, and same validity periods. We then show that the third type cannot be handled through the temporal star schema for temporal data warehouses (TDWs). We further show that a hybrid/Type6 scheme and temporal star schema may be used to handle this shortcoming. We demonstrate that the use of a surrogate key in the hybrid scheme efficiently identifies data, avoids most time comparisons, and improves query performance. Finally, we compare the TDWs and a surrogate key-based temporal data warehouse (SKTDW) using query formulation, query performance, and data warehouse size as parameters. The results of our experiments for 23 queries of five different types show that SKTDW outperforms TDW for all type of queries, with average and maximum performance improvements of 165% and 1071%, respectively. The results of our experiments are statistically significant.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.