Abstract

Mice are the most widely used model species for drug discovery and scientific research. Consequently, it is important to refine laboratory procedures and practices to ensure high standards of welfare and scientific data quality. Recent studies have identified that the standard practice of handling laboratory mice by their tails increases behaviours indicative of anxiety, which can be overcome by handling mice using a tunnel. However, despite clear negative effects on mice’s behaviour, tunnel handling has yet to be widely implemented. In this study, we provide the first evidence that tail handling also reduces mice’s responses to reward. Anhedonia is a core symptom of clinical depression, and is measured in rodents by assessing how they consume a sucrose solution: depressed mice consume less sucrose and the size of their licking bouts when drinking (their ‘lick cluster sizes’) also tend to be smaller. We found that tail handled mice showed more anhedonic responses in both measures compared to tunnel handled mice, indicative of a decreased responsiveness to reward and potentially a more depressive-like state. Our findings have significant implications for the welfare of laboratory mice as well as the design and interpretation of scientific studies, particularly those investigating or involving reward.

Highlights

  • Laboratory environments can negatively impact on the behaviour, physiology, health and welfare of animals[1,2,3,4] and considerable effort is made to regulate and improve the welfare of animals used in research laboratories around the world[5,6]

  • Much early work examined the housing in which mice are kept. This revealed that small cage sizes, lack of environmental enrichment, room temperatures and isolation can all negatively impact on mouse welfare, producing measurable changes in behaviour, physiology or affective state[9,10,11,12]

  • We extend previous work on handling methods to test if being handled by the tail or with a tunnel can affect the hedonic responses of mice towards a rewarding stimulus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Laboratory environments can negatively impact on the behaviour, physiology, health and welfare of animals[1,2,3,4] and considerable effort is made to regulate and improve the welfare of animals used in research laboratories around the world[5,6]. Much early work examined the housing in which mice are kept This revealed that small cage sizes, lack of environmental enrichment, room temperatures and isolation can all negatively impact on mouse welfare, producing measurable changes in behaviour, physiology or affective state[9,10,11,12]. Whilst previous studies investigating the effects of handling method on mouse welfare have measured the animals’ behaviour towards aversive experiences or punishments (such as being picked up by a handler or being placed in a novel test environment13–15), measuring responses to positive experiences and rewards (hedonic responses) are important for understanding the www.nature.com/scientificreports/. Whilst the main approach to studying animal welfare has been to measure the presence or absence of negative affective states, recent papers have highlighted the importance of measuring welfare from their positive experiences, such as pleasure[17,18,25]. The aim of this study was to test if the handling method affects the capacity of mice to experience pleasure from reward

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call