Abstract
In the future, the interzonal exchange of automatic Frequency Restoration Reserves (aFRR), i.e. their exchange between different control areas, is mandatory in Europe. Two control concepts are discussed for its realization: The Control Demand Model (CDM), currently used for existing aFRR cooperations in Europe, and the Control Request Model (CRM), for which only a conceptual definition exists so far without applications. In earlier work, a beneficial implementation of the CRM has been compared with the CDM for operation without active limitations and a stability analysis has been performed. However, the impact of limitations such as transfer capacity limits and finite aFRR availability has not been considered yet. As their impact may be significant, this paper aims at a comparison of both control models in scenarios with active limitations. After a brief recap of both CDM and CRM, we present three possible implementations for interzonal exchange of aFRR with limitations and compare them on the basis of different scenarios.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
