Abstract
Two instruments measuring handicap were evaluated and compared with clinical, laboratory and disability measures. Participants were 133 patients attending a rheumatology follow-up clinic in a district general hospital, of whom 102 were followed up after 3 months. Measurements included acute-phase response, early morning stiffness, pain, wellbeing, joint involvement (impairments), the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (disability), the Disease Repercussion Profile and the London Handicap Scale (handicap). A substantial burden of disability and handicap was recorded. There were moderate correlations between impairments (0.4 < rho < 0.6), and moderate to strong correlations between disability and handicap measures (0.4 < rho < 0.8). Correlations between impairment and disability/handicap were weak (rho < 0.4). Mean changes in all variables over 3 months were small, and none was statistically significant. A comprehensive description of the impact of disease and treatment requires measurements to be made of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. The use of clinical and laboratory variables alone may be misleading.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
