Abstract

AimsThis project aimed to assess the use of handcuffs in a secure forensic mental health hospital.BackgroundHandcuffs are used by secure forensic psychiatric wards where patients need to leave the ward and require added restrictive measures for their own or other's safety. The decision to use handcuffs is made by the multi-disciplinary team, with the input of the unit's clinical security team and is assessed based on individual risk and need. This study investigated the frequency, duration and purpose of handcuff use in one secure forensic mental health unit, encompassing 8 male medium secure wards, 5 male low secure wards, 1 adolescent secure ward,1 female low secure ward and 5 female medium secure wards.MethodHandcuff use was recorded contemporaneously by ward staff in a specialised handcuff proforma. This data were then compiled to assess the number of instances of use, the mental health section applicable to the patient, the reason the patient needed to leave the unit, and the duration of use (including the time period for which the handcuffs were removed during the visit, if applicable.) Data from these forms over an 18 month period were analysed.ResultOver the 18 months, there were a total of 347 uses of handcuffs, with an average of 18.3 occurrences per month. In 55 cases, the patients were detained under a civil section, with the remaining instances occurring in patients detained under forensic section. 47% were unsentenced prisoners.The most common destination for patients was the general medical hospital, which accounted for 49% of all visits. Court was the second most common destination, with 39% of uses.The average duration spent in handcuffs was 3.3 hours. The average time that the handcuffs were taken off during the transfer was 1.2 hours.ConclusionThrough ongoing education and supervision by the clinical security team, handcuff use in this forensic service was limited to essential situations, most often to allow treatment of physical health issues off-site. A large proportion of instances involved unsentenced prisoners and court attendances, where the risk of absconsion might be particularly high. Duration spent in handcuffs was kept to a minimum, with cuffs being removed where possible. The service strives to continue such good practices and to identify further ways to reduce handcuff use, such as using video-conferencing as an alternative court attendance.

Highlights

  • Individuals referred for MHAA by the Service had both medical recommendations completed within 5 days and those who required admission to hospital were admitted within 14 days of the recommendations being completed

  • This project aimed to assess the use of handcuffs in a secure forensic mental health hospital

  • This study investigated the frequency, duration and purpose of handcuff use in one secure forensic mental health unit, encompassing 8 male medium secure wards, 5 male low secure wards, 1 adolescent secure ward,[1] female low secure ward and 5 female medium secure wards

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individuals referred for MHAA by the Service had both medical recommendations completed within 5 days and those who required admission to hospital were admitted within 14 days of the recommendations being completed. Whilst these standards are being met, individuals referred for MHAA and those requiring admission to hospital are still facing remand to custody. This project aimed to assess the use of handcuffs in a secure forensic mental health hospital.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.