Abstract

Recent evidence strongly supports the importance of spinal sites of action for the ability of general anesthetic agents to block response to noxious stimuli. This study was designed to examine possible spinal anesthetic effects on non-noxiously evoked activity. Three groups of rats were prepared for acute experiments in which the response of spinal dorsal horn neurons to low threshold receptive field (RF) stimulation was evaluated. In each animal in each group extracellular activity was recorded from a single spinal dorsal horn neuron. A low-threshold RF of each neuron and, at times, the sensitivity to low-threshold stimulation of multiple sites in the RF were determined under baseline conditions (light anesthesia or decerebrate). In Group 1, reversible cooling of the thoracic spinal cord in the presence of either 0.5% or 1% halothane anesthesia caused no change in RF size. However, an increase from 0.5% to 1% halothane caused a 53% decrease in RF size both in the presence and absence of a reversible cold block of the spinal cord. In Group 2, animals with spinal cords transected at the thoracic level had a similar change in low-threshold receptive field size (52%) when halothane concentrations were increased from 0.5% to 1%. Testing sensitivity within the RF areas indicated that the silenced areas at the fringe of the receptive field could still elicit activation of spinal dorsal horn neurons but at a higher threshold. In the final group of animals, decerebration and spinal cord transection allowed us to compare effects of 0.5% and 1% halothane with an anesthetic free baseline. Here, again, a dose-dependent reduction in RF area was observed although the baseline RFs were significantly smaller than those in Groups 1 and 2. These results demonstrate that the reduction in low-threshold receptive field size due to the administration of the inhalation anesthetic halothane occurs in the absence of descending modulation from supraspinal sites. This implicates the spinal dorsal horn as a potentially important site of action for general anesthetics. These results also support the spinal cord as an important tool to study the pharmacology responsible for anesthetic effects on sensory processing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call