Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between Michael Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Special attention is payed to the relevance and application of Halliday’s concept of the (meta)functions of language (ideational, textual and interpersonal) as a methodological tool in CDA, for it potentially enables a socially and politically engaged language analysis devoid of ideologically motivated result interpretation by the researchers themselves. Since the very beginning of both SFL and CDA, these two fields have intertwined for various reasons, or characteristics they have in common. The three characteristics deemed most important in literature are: functional orientation, perspective that language mirrors social reality and is, in turn, shaped by it, and the stance that the ideological motivation of text and speech can be proven and identified through grammar, i.e. linguistic representation analysed within its context (Hart, 2014).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.