Abstract
Conflicting national media positions are often reflected in the discursive patterns used in news headlines. By using the headlines collected from online articles in the Chinese national daily newspaper China Daily and the American national daily newspaper The New York Times, Halliday’s transitivity analysis is deployed to analyze these processes in the light of critical discourse studies. The study finds that while China Daily holds a moderate attitude toward ChatGPT, The New York Times tends to view this new technology critically. The results also highlight the cultural values and ideologies of the two newspapers from the choices of their news headlines.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
