Abstract

This article develops a haircut model by treating repos as debt investments and seeks haircuts to control counterparty contingent exposure to asset price gap risk. It corroborates well with empirically stylized facts, explains tri-party and bilateral repo haircut differences, recasts haircut increases during the financial crisis, and sets a limit on access liquidity dealers can extract while acting as funding intermediaries between money market funds and hedge funds. Once a haircut is set, repo's residual risk becomes a pricing challenge, as is neither hedgeable nor diversifiable. We propose a capital pricing approach of computing repo economic capital and charging the borrower a cost of capital. Capital charge is shown to be countercyclical and a key element of repo pricing and used in explaining the repo pricing puzzle and maturity compression phenomenon.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call