Hair and dietary supplements testing to identify contamination with roxadustat in an adverse analytical finding

Abstract

Roxadustat is an oral inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase, which increases endogenous erythropoiesis. WADA has included roxadustat and other HIF stabilizers on its list of prohibited substances. We describe here the case of an elite athlete (female, 31 years old, 168 cm and 53 kg) with an adverse analytical finding (AAF) with concentration of roxadustat in her urine at 0.289 ng/mL in the A sample and 0.529 ng/mL in the B sample (83% higher than A). A stability study was carried out, showing total stability of roxadustat at this concentration in urine exposed to light for 50 h, so photoisomerization degradation cannot explain the difference in concentration. Her urine had been completely negative in a control test carried out three days previously, while roxadustat had been shown to be present in urine for at least 20 days after administration of pharmacologically effective doses to an athlete. Hair concentration was 0.39 and 0.35 pg/mg in the segments corresponding to the presumed period of intake, with few adjacent segments also positive (0.29–0.33 pg/mg), likely explained by cosmetic treatments. Concentrations found in a patient treated with a pharmacologically active dose (between 100 and 120 mg 3 days a week) were more than 100 times higher (between 41 and 57 pg/mg). Numerous supplements and pharmaceuticals taken by the athlete were analyzed. Only collagen powder showed the presence of roxadustat, at a very low but highly variable concentration (100 pg/g-1000 pg/g). A female volunteer (58 years old, 169 cm and 65 kg), taking this powder at the same doses as the athlete (10 g of powder 5 times for 6 days) presented 7 roxadustat-positive urine samples (although lower than those observed in the athlete) out of 34 sampled over 7 days, the difference in powder sampling location, age, weight, height, pharmacokinetic parameters variability and level of sporting activity between the athlete and the volunteer probably explaining the difference in concentrations observed. All these results could be consistent with an AAF due to contamination by dietary supplements, which are becoming increasingly common due to the current exposome of athletes in our society.