Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the early haemodynamic effects of continuous arteriovenous haemofiltration (CAVH) with those of continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) in normal and endotoxic piglets, within the framework of a two-period cross-over trial. Sixteen domestic piglets (weight 6-18 kg) underwent 1 h of CAVH followed by 1 h of CVVH or 1 h of CVVH followed by 1 h of CAVH. Six were pre-treated with a graded endotoxin infusion to simulate clinical sepsis. The main measurements included: heart rate; mean arterial (MAP), pulmonary artery, central venous and pulmonary artery occlusion pressures; thermodilution cardiac output; and calculated systemic (SVRI) and pulmonary vascular resistance indexes. Each measurement was performed immediately before and 30 min after commencement of each technique of filtration. Commencement of haemofiltration in normal piglets caused minimal haemodynamic effects. In endotoxic piglets, commencement of filtration, whether CAVH or CVVH, caused a haemodynamic change which was significantly more pronounced in the first filter (SVRI -39%, MAP -32%) than the second filter (SVRI +22%, MAP +0.9%) (SVRI, P=0.01, first filter vs. second) (MAP, P=0.009 first filter vs. second). In conclusion, there were no significant differences between the early haemodynamic effects of CAVH and CVVH in normal or endotoxic piglets. The haemodynamic effects of either technique may become more significant in the presence of sepsis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call